Archived Articles
Illinois Cultural News
(Articles appear from the newest to the oldest. To read the articles in the time line in which they were posted, scroll down to find the oldest in the tread and read upwards from oldest to newest.)
Illinois Primary Election
By Joyce Geiler
With the barrage of campaign mail filling mailboxes, probably everyone is aware that Illinois’ Primary Elections are this month. Primary Election Day is June 28, but polls are already open in some locations for early voting. It would be unfortunate and irresponsible to make voting decisions based on the campaign mail/propaganda flooding our eyes and ears. Rather than state their own platforms, many candidates in high-profile contests disseminate false information about their opponents. The definition of propaganda is “usually disapproving ideas or statements that are often false or exaggerated and that are spread in order to help a cause, a political leader, a government, etc.” (1)
In addition to the confusing information received about candidates, the recent rearrangement of voting districts in Illinois (redistricting) has left many wondering what district they are actually voting in this year. Others feel that since there has been so much election fraud, why bother to vote. It’s enough to make the fainthearted retreat into their homes and not appear again until after election day is over. Because elections do have consequences that must be lived with for several years, and because we live in a nation where we still have the right and responsibility to vote, this article will give some resources for discovering your new voting district and the associated candidates. Empowered with information, voters can make the best choice possible. Remember, in the Primary Election, one must choose a party and vote only for candidates in that party. Since the Primary Election is a single party ballot, other areas upon which the populace votes such as general mandates, proposals, or amendments are included only in the General Election in November.
A good portion of the emphasis of this article will be to provide resources for learning about voting for judges. Often judges don’t campaign as much as candidates in the legislative or executive branches of state and local government, and voters go to the polls unprepared to vote whether to retain judges or to vote for those where voting is required. Circuit, Appellate, and Illinois Supreme Court judicial positions are very important, and those positions are held for longer than the other two branches of State government.
Let’s begin with listing resources to find your current district and candidates. Several of the referenced resources list candidate websites so you can do further investigation before casting your vote. One of the most helpful guides is prepared by the Illinois Family Institute. However, since it is not interactive allowing you to find your new district, it is listed second. Ballotpedia (2) is interactive. By entering the address where you are registered to vote, you can view a sample ballot, which includes information specific to your district. The site lists affiliated party, has links for more detailed information about candidates, and includes judges.
The Illinois Family Institute (IFI) 2022 Primary Election Voter Guide (3), a downloadable PDF, is available on their site. In this guide, you will find the positions of candidates running for U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, Statewide offices, and both chambers of the Illinois General Assembly regarding issues of importance. Incumbent voting records, completed candidate questionnaires, research, and various organization endorsements went into compiling this voting resource. You will need to know your district. The guide does not include judges.
Other resources include information gathered by the League of Women Voters, which includes a link to find your voting district (4) and the I Vote Guide (5) produced by the American Family Association Action. This guide rates candidates’ degree of conservative or liberal. It does not list judges.
The last referenced site is prepared by the Illinois State Board of Elections. Their website (6) has a link for “find my elected officials”. Navigating there will provide links to view current district officials, including judges. This site will not be helpful for new candidates at any level but has been included because of the information about judges. Continuing to follow the links will take you to the websites of current judges, which can be helpful in determining whether to vote to retain them.
Several references have been made in this article to the importance of voting regarding judges. Although judges comprise only a small portion of the people for whom we vote, their terms last longer. The term for Illinois supreme court and appellate court judges is ten years and the term for circuit court judges is six years. Judicial elections in Illinois occur during even-numbered years. Supreme, appellate, and circuit court judges in Illinois participate in partisan elections. At the end of their term, judges have the option to run in a retention election. Illinois is one of eight states that uses partisan elections to initially select judges and then uses retention elections to determine whether judges should remain on the bench. (7)
The Illinois Supreme Court, the highest court in Illinois, includes seven justices who are elected to 10-year terms in partisan elections; and after the completion of their 10-year term, they must compete in uncontested, nonpartisan retention elections to continue serving. Unlike most states, supreme court justices in Illinois are elected to represent specific districts. The seven justices are divided among five districts (three allocated to Cook County and the others divided evenly among the other four districts) and are voted into office by the residents of their respective regions. In the event of a midterm vacancy, the Illinois Supreme Court is responsible for appointing an interim justice. The interim justice serves until the next general election occurring at least 60 days after his or her appointment, at which point the justice must run in a partisan election to continue serving.
The Illinois Supreme Court is currently comprised of three Republicans and four Democrats. The terms of four of the justices will expire in 2022, of which two seats are for partisan election in the June primary election and two seats are for retention in the November 8 election. Democratic candidates running in the primary for Illinois Supreme Court 2nd District include René Cruz, Elizabeth M. Rochford, and Nancy Rotering. Republican candidates running in the primary for the 2nd District include Mark Curran, Susan Hutchinson, John A. Noverini, and Daniel Shanes. Candidates running for the Illinois Supreme Court 3rd District include Mary O’Brian on the Democratic ticket and Michael J. Burke on the Republican ticket. (8)
The terms of 15 Illinois Appellate Court judges will expire on December 4, 2022, and one appointment that filled a vacancy seat is up for special election. All 16 seats from all five Appellate Courts will be voted upon in either the partisan, primary election in June or the retention election on November 8. See Ballotpedia for the listing by district. (9)
Ballotpedia does not list information about Circuit Court judge elections. County Clerks should be able to give you that information. Elections are administered locally by the state’s 108 election authorities. These are the county clerks in 101 counties plus one county election commission and 6 municipal election commissions. These local authorities are a very important part of Illinois’ election process. As part of their many responsibilities, they handle local voter registration programs, train election judges, select polling places, get ballots printed, oversee Election Day activities, and supervise the vote count at the local level. To find the contact information for your county’s election authority, go to the Illinois State Board of Elections' Election Authorities page (10) and select your county.
As citizens of a nation in which we have the privilege of voting for candidates in all three branches of government, it behooves us to do the research in order to vote responsibly. Of course, we pray for our nation and our state, and we implore the intervention of our God in the affairs of our land, but we must also function in the natural realm. Educate yourself and vote.
Endnotes:
(1) https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/propaganda
(2) https://ballotpedia.org/Sample_Ballot_Lookup?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=2079ea3e-ef4d-476a-ad06-e49045ca2921
(3) https://illinoisfamily.org/ifi_news/ifi-voter-guide-resources-for-primary-election-2022/
(4) https://www.lwvil.org/candidateforum?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=2079ea3e-ef4d-476a-ad06-e49045ca2921
(5) https://ivoterguide.com/
(6) https://www.elections.il.gov/Default.aspx
(7) https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_judicial_elections
(8) https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Supreme_Court_elections,_2022
(9) https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_intermediate_appellate_court_elections,_2022
(10) https://www.elections.il.gov/ElectionOperations/ElectionAuthorities.aspx?T=637901409801588409
By Joyce Geiler
With the barrage of campaign mail filling mailboxes, probably everyone is aware that Illinois’ Primary Elections are this month. Primary Election Day is June 28, but polls are already open in some locations for early voting. It would be unfortunate and irresponsible to make voting decisions based on the campaign mail/propaganda flooding our eyes and ears. Rather than state their own platforms, many candidates in high-profile contests disseminate false information about their opponents. The definition of propaganda is “usually disapproving ideas or statements that are often false or exaggerated and that are spread in order to help a cause, a political leader, a government, etc.” (1)
In addition to the confusing information received about candidates, the recent rearrangement of voting districts in Illinois (redistricting) has left many wondering what district they are actually voting in this year. Others feel that since there has been so much election fraud, why bother to vote. It’s enough to make the fainthearted retreat into their homes and not appear again until after election day is over. Because elections do have consequences that must be lived with for several years, and because we live in a nation where we still have the right and responsibility to vote, this article will give some resources for discovering your new voting district and the associated candidates. Empowered with information, voters can make the best choice possible. Remember, in the Primary Election, one must choose a party and vote only for candidates in that party. Since the Primary Election is a single party ballot, other areas upon which the populace votes such as general mandates, proposals, or amendments are included only in the General Election in November.
A good portion of the emphasis of this article will be to provide resources for learning about voting for judges. Often judges don’t campaign as much as candidates in the legislative or executive branches of state and local government, and voters go to the polls unprepared to vote whether to retain judges or to vote for those where voting is required. Circuit, Appellate, and Illinois Supreme Court judicial positions are very important, and those positions are held for longer than the other two branches of State government.
Let’s begin with listing resources to find your current district and candidates. Several of the referenced resources list candidate websites so you can do further investigation before casting your vote. One of the most helpful guides is prepared by the Illinois Family Institute. However, since it is not interactive allowing you to find your new district, it is listed second. Ballotpedia (2) is interactive. By entering the address where you are registered to vote, you can view a sample ballot, which includes information specific to your district. The site lists affiliated party, has links for more detailed information about candidates, and includes judges.
The Illinois Family Institute (IFI) 2022 Primary Election Voter Guide (3), a downloadable PDF, is available on their site. In this guide, you will find the positions of candidates running for U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, Statewide offices, and both chambers of the Illinois General Assembly regarding issues of importance. Incumbent voting records, completed candidate questionnaires, research, and various organization endorsements went into compiling this voting resource. You will need to know your district. The guide does not include judges.
Other resources include information gathered by the League of Women Voters, which includes a link to find your voting district (4) and the I Vote Guide (5) produced by the American Family Association Action. This guide rates candidates’ degree of conservative or liberal. It does not list judges.
The last referenced site is prepared by the Illinois State Board of Elections. Their website (6) has a link for “find my elected officials”. Navigating there will provide links to view current district officials, including judges. This site will not be helpful for new candidates at any level but has been included because of the information about judges. Continuing to follow the links will take you to the websites of current judges, which can be helpful in determining whether to vote to retain them.
Several references have been made in this article to the importance of voting regarding judges. Although judges comprise only a small portion of the people for whom we vote, their terms last longer. The term for Illinois supreme court and appellate court judges is ten years and the term for circuit court judges is six years. Judicial elections in Illinois occur during even-numbered years. Supreme, appellate, and circuit court judges in Illinois participate in partisan elections. At the end of their term, judges have the option to run in a retention election. Illinois is one of eight states that uses partisan elections to initially select judges and then uses retention elections to determine whether judges should remain on the bench. (7)
The Illinois Supreme Court, the highest court in Illinois, includes seven justices who are elected to 10-year terms in partisan elections; and after the completion of their 10-year term, they must compete in uncontested, nonpartisan retention elections to continue serving. Unlike most states, supreme court justices in Illinois are elected to represent specific districts. The seven justices are divided among five districts (three allocated to Cook County and the others divided evenly among the other four districts) and are voted into office by the residents of their respective regions. In the event of a midterm vacancy, the Illinois Supreme Court is responsible for appointing an interim justice. The interim justice serves until the next general election occurring at least 60 days after his or her appointment, at which point the justice must run in a partisan election to continue serving.
The Illinois Supreme Court is currently comprised of three Republicans and four Democrats. The terms of four of the justices will expire in 2022, of which two seats are for partisan election in the June primary election and two seats are for retention in the November 8 election. Democratic candidates running in the primary for Illinois Supreme Court 2nd District include René Cruz, Elizabeth M. Rochford, and Nancy Rotering. Republican candidates running in the primary for the 2nd District include Mark Curran, Susan Hutchinson, John A. Noverini, and Daniel Shanes. Candidates running for the Illinois Supreme Court 3rd District include Mary O’Brian on the Democratic ticket and Michael J. Burke on the Republican ticket. (8)
The terms of 15 Illinois Appellate Court judges will expire on December 4, 2022, and one appointment that filled a vacancy seat is up for special election. All 16 seats from all five Appellate Courts will be voted upon in either the partisan, primary election in June or the retention election on November 8. See Ballotpedia for the listing by district. (9)
Ballotpedia does not list information about Circuit Court judge elections. County Clerks should be able to give you that information. Elections are administered locally by the state’s 108 election authorities. These are the county clerks in 101 counties plus one county election commission and 6 municipal election commissions. These local authorities are a very important part of Illinois’ election process. As part of their many responsibilities, they handle local voter registration programs, train election judges, select polling places, get ballots printed, oversee Election Day activities, and supervise the vote count at the local level. To find the contact information for your county’s election authority, go to the Illinois State Board of Elections' Election Authorities page (10) and select your county.
As citizens of a nation in which we have the privilege of voting for candidates in all three branches of government, it behooves us to do the research in order to vote responsibly. Of course, we pray for our nation and our state, and we implore the intervention of our God in the affairs of our land, but we must also function in the natural realm. Educate yourself and vote.
Endnotes:
(1) https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/propaganda
(2) https://ballotpedia.org/Sample_Ballot_Lookup?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=2079ea3e-ef4d-476a-ad06-e49045ca2921
(3) https://illinoisfamily.org/ifi_news/ifi-voter-guide-resources-for-primary-election-2022/
(4) https://www.lwvil.org/candidateforum?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=2079ea3e-ef4d-476a-ad06-e49045ca2921
(5) https://ivoterguide.com/
(6) https://www.elections.il.gov/Default.aspx
(7) https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_judicial_elections
(8) https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Supreme_Court_elections,_2022
(9) https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_intermediate_appellate_court_elections,_2022
(10) https://www.elections.il.gov/ElectionOperations/ElectionAuthorities.aspx?T=637901409801588409
Amendment 1 Challenged
By Joyce Geiler
Last issue laid out information concerning Amendment 1, which will appear on the November ballot in Illinois. The “Illinois Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment” (Amendment 1) would create a state constitutional right for employees to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing to negotiate "wages, hours, and working conditions and to protect their economic welfare and safety at work." The ballot measure would also prohibit laws that interfere with, negate, or diminish collective bargaining agreements, including agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment, effectively prohibiting a right-to-work law in Illinois. (1)
Illinois Policy Institute states, “Amendment 1 would hand Illinois’ government union leaders the most extreme powers in the nation. It does so by voiding over 350 state provisions and adding several unprecedented labor provisions to the state constitution, including a guarantee that taxes and debt will go up. Because there is no limit on what government union leaders can demand, no limit on what state and local governments can give away, and no requirement to pay for new costs, Amendment 1 will lock in sky-high property tax rates in Illinois and make Illinois home to a more corrupt government at a higher cost. Government union bosses will be held accountable by no one - not even the state legislature. Amendment 1 will give untold power to unions in the state constitution.” (2)
Two parents in the Chicago Public School district along with two teachers filed a petition April 21, 2022, in the Seventh Judicial Circuit Court in Sangamon County asking that the Illinois State Board of Elections remove the question from the ballot because it oversteps national labor relations law and is therefore unconstitutional. They are represented by the Liberty Justice Center, a national nonprofit law firm, and the Illinois Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research organization. (3)
On May 14, 2022, Illinois Policy Institute, along with Liberty Justice Center, announced they had filed an official lawsuit against Amendment 1. The lawsuit alleges that the amendment language is so broad that it will preempt federal laws, which would make it unconstitutional. Because of that, the litigants are seeking to remove the amendment from the November 8th general election ballot. (4)
Mailee Smith, director of labor policy and staff attorney for the Illinois Policy Institute, said, “The language as written in Amendment 1 is too broad. If Illinois was seeking solely to make right-to-work unconstitutional in Illinois, the phrasing would have reflected that, as it did in a previous version of this amendment filed in 2019. Instead, the current phrasing creates a litany of problems, could lead to unparalleled power by a special interest group and most importantly, is unconstitutional. Amendment 1 claims to give any employee – from either private businesses or government – a “fundamental right” to engage in collective bargaining for various reasons. But the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) governs private-sector collective bargaining nationwide – and preempts state laws that would attempt to do so. The plaintiffs argue the proposal is unconstitutional and are seeking a court order directing state leaders to keep it off the ballot.
“Of particular concern to the plaintiffs is that the NLRA limits the subjects of mandatory collective bargaining to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. In the past 10 years, Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) has walked out five times over affordable housing, mental health and other bargaining terms that were not wages and hours.” (5) The Chicago Teachers Union is pushing for this amendment.
“Amendment 1 violates the U.S. Constitution and must be taken off the ballot. Federal law protects and regulates collective bargaining in the private sector,” said Jacob Huebert, president of the Liberty Justice Center. “This attempt to create a state-law right to private-sector collective bargaining on top of that violates federal law and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Illinois Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that unconstitutional proposals cannot go before the voters, so the courts should order state officials to remove Amendment 1 from the ballot.” (6)
Government unions are experiencing decreasing power with a 9% decrease in membership that has occurred since the U.S. Supreme Court restored the right of government workers to choose to not join a union in the 2018 Janus v. AFSCME decision. (7) Chicago Teachers Union is pushing an amendment to the Illinois Constitution to expand their ability to bargain and strike over a much wider range of topics, including its social agenda on housing, immigration, “restorative justice,” wealth redistribution and defunding the police. (8)
The enactment of the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act in 1984 allowed teachers unions to strike and district students to lose instructional days as school boards and union leaders negotiated over union demands. The Chicago Teachers’ Union history illustrates how this law plays out in practice. The CTU has gone on strike 11 times. Current and former CTU teachers have accused union leadership of viewing “work stoppages and strikes as the first step, and not the last one.” This quick-trigger treatment of strikes has led to concern that CTU overuses its right to strike. All of Illinois’ neighboring states explicitly prohibit teacher strikes. If Amendment 1 passes, any prohibitions against teachers’ union strikes proposed by elected lawmakers would be invalid. That’s because such prohibitions would “interfere with” or “diminish” the right of teachers to “bargain collectively.’ This language is broad, making it difficult to predict all the ramifications of the provisions that could fall under the amendment if it is passes. (9)
Also, more recently, the CTU has used walkouts to force Chicago Public Schools to meet their COVID-19 protocol demands in which they demanded distance education and then masks when classroom learning resumed. CTU has already pushed its social agenda on housing, immigration, “restorative justice,” wealth redistribution and defunding the police. Key demands listed on their website include: justice for students and families, affordable housing, sanctuary schools, sustainable community schools and restorative justice. (10) The September 22, 2020 CTU posting states, “In order to open schools safely and give our communities the resources we need to weather the COVID-19 pandemic, we need to invest a lot more funds in our under-resourced public services. We can only pay for that if we make the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share in taxes– and if we stop wasting money on things that do more harm than good. Specifically, this means defunding the police and canceling our payments to Wall Street. The CTU and allies led a series of bank actions in August 2020 to demand interest-free financing for social needs in this moment of crisis. We need the federal government to make grants to our state and local governments to give us the resources our communities need to thrive.” (11)
In summary, not only is Amendment 1 unconstitutional because of the National Labor Relations Act, it is unconscionable for such unlimited power to be placed in the hands of unelected people.
Endnotes:
1. https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Right_to_Collective_Bargaining_Amendment_(2022)
2. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/
3. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-parents-teachers-sue-to-get-unconstitutional-union-boost-off-ballot/
4. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/
5. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-parents-teachers-sue-to-get-unconstitutional-union-boost-off-ballot/
6. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-parents-teachers-sue-to-get-unconstitutional-union-boost-off-ballot/
7. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/
8. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-parents-teachers-sue-to-get-unconstitutional-union-boost-off-ballot/
9. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/pritzker-fact-check-college-applications-up-because-high-schools-now-require-them/
10. https://www.ctulocal1.org/movement/contract-campaigns/about/
11. https://www.ctulocal1.org/chicago-union-teacher/2020/09/defund-police-and-banks-support-schools-and-a-more-just-social-order/
By Joyce Geiler
Last issue laid out information concerning Amendment 1, which will appear on the November ballot in Illinois. The “Illinois Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment” (Amendment 1) would create a state constitutional right for employees to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing to negotiate "wages, hours, and working conditions and to protect their economic welfare and safety at work." The ballot measure would also prohibit laws that interfere with, negate, or diminish collective bargaining agreements, including agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment, effectively prohibiting a right-to-work law in Illinois. (1)
Illinois Policy Institute states, “Amendment 1 would hand Illinois’ government union leaders the most extreme powers in the nation. It does so by voiding over 350 state provisions and adding several unprecedented labor provisions to the state constitution, including a guarantee that taxes and debt will go up. Because there is no limit on what government union leaders can demand, no limit on what state and local governments can give away, and no requirement to pay for new costs, Amendment 1 will lock in sky-high property tax rates in Illinois and make Illinois home to a more corrupt government at a higher cost. Government union bosses will be held accountable by no one - not even the state legislature. Amendment 1 will give untold power to unions in the state constitution.” (2)
Two parents in the Chicago Public School district along with two teachers filed a petition April 21, 2022, in the Seventh Judicial Circuit Court in Sangamon County asking that the Illinois State Board of Elections remove the question from the ballot because it oversteps national labor relations law and is therefore unconstitutional. They are represented by the Liberty Justice Center, a national nonprofit law firm, and the Illinois Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research organization. (3)
On May 14, 2022, Illinois Policy Institute, along with Liberty Justice Center, announced they had filed an official lawsuit against Amendment 1. The lawsuit alleges that the amendment language is so broad that it will preempt federal laws, which would make it unconstitutional. Because of that, the litigants are seeking to remove the amendment from the November 8th general election ballot. (4)
Mailee Smith, director of labor policy and staff attorney for the Illinois Policy Institute, said, “The language as written in Amendment 1 is too broad. If Illinois was seeking solely to make right-to-work unconstitutional in Illinois, the phrasing would have reflected that, as it did in a previous version of this amendment filed in 2019. Instead, the current phrasing creates a litany of problems, could lead to unparalleled power by a special interest group and most importantly, is unconstitutional. Amendment 1 claims to give any employee – from either private businesses or government – a “fundamental right” to engage in collective bargaining for various reasons. But the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) governs private-sector collective bargaining nationwide – and preempts state laws that would attempt to do so. The plaintiffs argue the proposal is unconstitutional and are seeking a court order directing state leaders to keep it off the ballot.
“Of particular concern to the plaintiffs is that the NLRA limits the subjects of mandatory collective bargaining to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. In the past 10 years, Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) has walked out five times over affordable housing, mental health and other bargaining terms that were not wages and hours.” (5) The Chicago Teachers Union is pushing for this amendment.
“Amendment 1 violates the U.S. Constitution and must be taken off the ballot. Federal law protects and regulates collective bargaining in the private sector,” said Jacob Huebert, president of the Liberty Justice Center. “This attempt to create a state-law right to private-sector collective bargaining on top of that violates federal law and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Illinois Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that unconstitutional proposals cannot go before the voters, so the courts should order state officials to remove Amendment 1 from the ballot.” (6)
Government unions are experiencing decreasing power with a 9% decrease in membership that has occurred since the U.S. Supreme Court restored the right of government workers to choose to not join a union in the 2018 Janus v. AFSCME decision. (7) Chicago Teachers Union is pushing an amendment to the Illinois Constitution to expand their ability to bargain and strike over a much wider range of topics, including its social agenda on housing, immigration, “restorative justice,” wealth redistribution and defunding the police. (8)
The enactment of the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act in 1984 allowed teachers unions to strike and district students to lose instructional days as school boards and union leaders negotiated over union demands. The Chicago Teachers’ Union history illustrates how this law plays out in practice. The CTU has gone on strike 11 times. Current and former CTU teachers have accused union leadership of viewing “work stoppages and strikes as the first step, and not the last one.” This quick-trigger treatment of strikes has led to concern that CTU overuses its right to strike. All of Illinois’ neighboring states explicitly prohibit teacher strikes. If Amendment 1 passes, any prohibitions against teachers’ union strikes proposed by elected lawmakers would be invalid. That’s because such prohibitions would “interfere with” or “diminish” the right of teachers to “bargain collectively.’ This language is broad, making it difficult to predict all the ramifications of the provisions that could fall under the amendment if it is passes. (9)
Also, more recently, the CTU has used walkouts to force Chicago Public Schools to meet their COVID-19 protocol demands in which they demanded distance education and then masks when classroom learning resumed. CTU has already pushed its social agenda on housing, immigration, “restorative justice,” wealth redistribution and defunding the police. Key demands listed on their website include: justice for students and families, affordable housing, sanctuary schools, sustainable community schools and restorative justice. (10) The September 22, 2020 CTU posting states, “In order to open schools safely and give our communities the resources we need to weather the COVID-19 pandemic, we need to invest a lot more funds in our under-resourced public services. We can only pay for that if we make the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share in taxes– and if we stop wasting money on things that do more harm than good. Specifically, this means defunding the police and canceling our payments to Wall Street. The CTU and allies led a series of bank actions in August 2020 to demand interest-free financing for social needs in this moment of crisis. We need the federal government to make grants to our state and local governments to give us the resources our communities need to thrive.” (11)
In summary, not only is Amendment 1 unconstitutional because of the National Labor Relations Act, it is unconscionable for such unlimited power to be placed in the hands of unelected people.
Endnotes:
1. https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Right_to_Collective_Bargaining_Amendment_(2022)
2. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/
3. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-parents-teachers-sue-to-get-unconstitutional-union-boost-off-ballot/
4. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/
5. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-parents-teachers-sue-to-get-unconstitutional-union-boost-off-ballot/
6. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-parents-teachers-sue-to-get-unconstitutional-union-boost-off-ballot/
7. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/
8. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-parents-teachers-sue-to-get-unconstitutional-union-boost-off-ballot/
9. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/pritzker-fact-check-college-applications-up-because-high-schools-now-require-them/
10. https://www.ctulocal1.org/movement/contract-campaigns/about/
11. https://www.ctulocal1.org/chicago-union-teacher/2020/09/defund-police-and-banks-support-schools-and-a-more-just-social-order/
Impact of Amendment 1 on November Ballot
By Joyce Geiler
Amendment 1 is an Illinois constitutional amendment that will be on the ballot next November. With the myriad of concerns currently facing Illinoisans, it may seem premature to consider something that is six months away, but it would be best to not let this potential change to our state constitution be lost in current events. One current event in particular, the indictment on racketeering charges of former House Speaker, Mike Madigan, is actually related to Amendment 1.
Let’s look at exactly what Amendment 1 entails. Then we will recount how Madigan took Illinois to the place where Amendment 1 is positioned to make legal the effects of the corruption he used. In a follow-up article we will detail the probable effect of this amendment on schools and property taxes. This is not an inconsequential amendment!
What would this ballot measure add to the Illinois Constitution?
The “Illinois Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment” (Amendment 1) would create a state constitutional right for employees to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing to negotiate "wages, hours, and working conditions and to protect their economic welfare and safety at work." The ballot measure would also prohibit laws that interfere with, negate, or diminish collective bargaining agreements, including agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment, effectively prohibiting a right-to-work law in Illinois. (2)
As of 2021, at least three state constitutions—Hawaii, Missouri, and New York—provided a right to collective bargaining. The Illinois Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment, however, would provide a right to collective bargaining AND also preempt right-to-work laws that prohibit collective bargaining agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment. Language preempting right-to-work laws was not included in the state constitutions of Hawaii, Missouri, or New York. (3)
A careful look at the supporters and opponents of this proposed amendment reveals that supporters are Democrats and unions, and opponents are Republicans and businesses. Supporters of Amendment 1 are Illinois Sen. Ram Villivalam (D) and Illinois Representatives Marcus Evans (D) and Lance Yednock (D). Unions supporting the Amendment are: Associated Fire Fighters of Illinois, Chicago Laborers' District Council, Chicago Teachers Union, Illinois AFL-CIO, Illinois Federation of Teachers, Illinois Pipe Trades Association and SEIU Healthcare Illinois & Indiana. Opponents of the amendment are Illinois Rep. Blaine Wilhour (R) and Illinois Association of School Boards, Illinois Chamber of Commerce, Illinois Manufacturers' Association, National Federation of Independent Business. (4)
As stated above, the Illinois Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment would prohibit laws that “interfere with, negate, or diminish agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment.” Such laws are known as right-to-work laws. As of 2021, 27 states had right-to-work laws and 23 states, including Illinois, did not have right-to-work laws, but neither did they have laws prohibiting right-to-work. (5)
Now, let’s examine how this amendment would solidify what now-indicted Michael Madigan accomplished over his decades as House Speaker. During those decades Madigan built up public employee union power as those unions built up Madigan’s campaign funds. Over 26 years, Madigan-controlled campaign funds saw $10 million in donations from Illinois government unions. They, in turn, received decades of pro-union legislation and a public pension system so generous that the unfunded debt grew 753% under Madigan’s leadership, to $140 billion in 2020.
How did it all start?
The Illinois Policy Institute outlines the process. In 1983, Madigan’s first year as Speaker, the Illinois General Assembly passed the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act and the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act. Under Madigan’s leadership, unions pushed lawmakers to pass both pieces of legislation, which mandated collective bargaining for public employees and gave them the power to strike – a power few states allow and something labor and political leaders advised against. (Note, this discussion of unions concerns public employee unions.)
George Meany, the first president of the AFL-CIO, said public unions should be excluded from collective bargaining. Meany said, “it is impossible to collectively bargain with the government.” Before Meany, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said public employees were unique in that they were employed by taxpayers. “All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service,” Roosevelt wrote. All of Illinois’ neighbor states, plus Michigan, prohibit all or most government employees from going on strike.
Under Madigan’s leadership, labor legislation in Illinois only passed if it expanded union powers. The unions rewarded him with that $10 million he used to keep other lawmakers and even governors under his control. For example, Senate Bill 1784, which passed into law in 2019, gave unions unprecedented access to personal information such as cell phone numbers and email addresses of all government employees, even ones who weren’t union members. (6)
The proposed amendment would cement four new provisions into the constitution that no other state has. It would give unions a permanent right to collective bargaining over not just benefits, but any topic they choose – a power the Chicago Teachers Union has tried to wield to pursue its social agenda on housing, immigration, restorative justice, wealth redistribution and defunding the police. Union contracts would carry the weight of the constitution, overriding state laws.
What’s most dangerous about Amendment 1 is that, if passed, it can never be limited or altered, even if every lawmaker and voter in the state agreed it needed changing. Unions could replace Madigan’s corrupt path to power with a legal one by getting Amendment 1 put into the Illinois Constitution. (7) (Note: Although Illinois Policy states above that the amendment can never be changed, it can be changed or repealed by another constitutional amendment, which is a rare happening.)
Examining the progression of increasing control wielded by government unions helps clarify the danger of passing Amendment 1 in November. Next issue we will examine the effects of passing such a measure on Illinois schools and property taxes.
End Notes: 1. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/amendment-1-would-permanently-enshrine-madigan-union-deals-in-illinois-constitution/
2. https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Right_to_Collective_Bargaining_Amendment_(2022)
3. Ibid Ballotpedia
4. Ibid Ballotpedia
5. Ibid Ballotpedia 6. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/amendment-1-would-permanently-enshrine-madigan-union-deals-in-illinois-constitution/
7. Ibid Illinoispolicy.org
By Joyce Geiler
Amendment 1 is an Illinois constitutional amendment that will be on the ballot next November. With the myriad of concerns currently facing Illinoisans, it may seem premature to consider something that is six months away, but it would be best to not let this potential change to our state constitution be lost in current events. One current event in particular, the indictment on racketeering charges of former House Speaker, Mike Madigan, is actually related to Amendment 1.
Let’s look at exactly what Amendment 1 entails. Then we will recount how Madigan took Illinois to the place where Amendment 1 is positioned to make legal the effects of the corruption he used. In a follow-up article we will detail the probable effect of this amendment on schools and property taxes. This is not an inconsequential amendment!
What would this ballot measure add to the Illinois Constitution?
The “Illinois Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment” (Amendment 1) would create a state constitutional right for employees to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing to negotiate "wages, hours, and working conditions and to protect their economic welfare and safety at work." The ballot measure would also prohibit laws that interfere with, negate, or diminish collective bargaining agreements, including agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment, effectively prohibiting a right-to-work law in Illinois. (2)
As of 2021, at least three state constitutions—Hawaii, Missouri, and New York—provided a right to collective bargaining. The Illinois Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment, however, would provide a right to collective bargaining AND also preempt right-to-work laws that prohibit collective bargaining agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment. Language preempting right-to-work laws was not included in the state constitutions of Hawaii, Missouri, or New York. (3)
A careful look at the supporters and opponents of this proposed amendment reveals that supporters are Democrats and unions, and opponents are Republicans and businesses. Supporters of Amendment 1 are Illinois Sen. Ram Villivalam (D) and Illinois Representatives Marcus Evans (D) and Lance Yednock (D). Unions supporting the Amendment are: Associated Fire Fighters of Illinois, Chicago Laborers' District Council, Chicago Teachers Union, Illinois AFL-CIO, Illinois Federation of Teachers, Illinois Pipe Trades Association and SEIU Healthcare Illinois & Indiana. Opponents of the amendment are Illinois Rep. Blaine Wilhour (R) and Illinois Association of School Boards, Illinois Chamber of Commerce, Illinois Manufacturers' Association, National Federation of Independent Business. (4)
As stated above, the Illinois Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment would prohibit laws that “interfere with, negate, or diminish agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment.” Such laws are known as right-to-work laws. As of 2021, 27 states had right-to-work laws and 23 states, including Illinois, did not have right-to-work laws, but neither did they have laws prohibiting right-to-work. (5)
Now, let’s examine how this amendment would solidify what now-indicted Michael Madigan accomplished over his decades as House Speaker. During those decades Madigan built up public employee union power as those unions built up Madigan’s campaign funds. Over 26 years, Madigan-controlled campaign funds saw $10 million in donations from Illinois government unions. They, in turn, received decades of pro-union legislation and a public pension system so generous that the unfunded debt grew 753% under Madigan’s leadership, to $140 billion in 2020.
How did it all start?
The Illinois Policy Institute outlines the process. In 1983, Madigan’s first year as Speaker, the Illinois General Assembly passed the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act and the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act. Under Madigan’s leadership, unions pushed lawmakers to pass both pieces of legislation, which mandated collective bargaining for public employees and gave them the power to strike – a power few states allow and something labor and political leaders advised against. (Note, this discussion of unions concerns public employee unions.)
George Meany, the first president of the AFL-CIO, said public unions should be excluded from collective bargaining. Meany said, “it is impossible to collectively bargain with the government.” Before Meany, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said public employees were unique in that they were employed by taxpayers. “All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service,” Roosevelt wrote. All of Illinois’ neighbor states, plus Michigan, prohibit all or most government employees from going on strike.
Under Madigan’s leadership, labor legislation in Illinois only passed if it expanded union powers. The unions rewarded him with that $10 million he used to keep other lawmakers and even governors under his control. For example, Senate Bill 1784, which passed into law in 2019, gave unions unprecedented access to personal information such as cell phone numbers and email addresses of all government employees, even ones who weren’t union members. (6)
The proposed amendment would cement four new provisions into the constitution that no other state has. It would give unions a permanent right to collective bargaining over not just benefits, but any topic they choose – a power the Chicago Teachers Union has tried to wield to pursue its social agenda on housing, immigration, restorative justice, wealth redistribution and defunding the police. Union contracts would carry the weight of the constitution, overriding state laws.
What’s most dangerous about Amendment 1 is that, if passed, it can never be limited or altered, even if every lawmaker and voter in the state agreed it needed changing. Unions could replace Madigan’s corrupt path to power with a legal one by getting Amendment 1 put into the Illinois Constitution. (7) (Note: Although Illinois Policy states above that the amendment can never be changed, it can be changed or repealed by another constitutional amendment, which is a rare happening.)
Examining the progression of increasing control wielded by government unions helps clarify the danger of passing Amendment 1 in November. Next issue we will examine the effects of passing such a measure on Illinois schools and property taxes.
End Notes: 1. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/amendment-1-would-permanently-enshrine-madigan-union-deals-in-illinois-constitution/
2. https://ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Right_to_Collective_Bargaining_Amendment_(2022)
3. Ibid Ballotpedia
4. Ibid Ballotpedia
5. Ibid Ballotpedia 6. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/amendment-1-would-permanently-enshrine-madigan-union-deals-in-illinois-constitution/
7. Ibid Illinoispolicy.org
CRT In Schools
By Joyce Geiler
Are classes being taught through the lens of Critical Race Theory (CRT) or are teachers being informed by CRT? It is the viewpoint of the black civil rights leader Bob Woodson that CRT is “explicitly and implicitly a racist approach to education,” and that approach is increasingly infiltrating our schools. One could say technically CRT is not being taught in the classroom because it is not distributed in the form of a textbook; but nonetheless, volumes have been written on critical race theory and its influence and its tenants are in our schools. (1)
Parents for America has an excellent article on how to understand CRT’s influence and tenants in schools. (2) A Cornell Law School professor has launched a new website about critical race theory curriculum in the US that features a state-by-state list of more than 200 colleges and universities promoting critical race theory. (3) On that website, one can click on any state and find schools and information about critical race theory in that state. (4)
(The reader may remember that article earlier this year reported on the approval of the Illinois State Board of Education Standards to infuse the assumptions of Critical Race Theory/ identity politics/BLM into: 1. all teacher-training programs; 2. all Professional Education Licensing (PEL); and 3. indirectly into all public-school classrooms. More information on this topic can also be found at this IFI link (5) https://illinoisfamily.org/education/despite-nationwide-condemnation-illinois-passes-controversial-leftist-teacher-training-mandate/)
As of this writing, it is known that the following two major Illinois school settings ARE overtly teaching Critical Race Theory precepts:
1. The Center for Mathematics, Science, & Technology at Illinois State University has issued a statement standing in solidarity with those protesting racism and injustice now and at all times. The Center states it is committed to providing equitable, anti-racist STEM education that allows all students to fulfill their potential in STEM disciplines. (6)
2. An Illinois high school, the Illinois Science and Mathematics Academy, a top rated, public, magnet school in Aurora that proposes to develop creative, ethical leaders in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, is offering a course titled “Introduction to Critical Race Theory in Education Research.” Laurie Higgins, writer for Illinois Family Institute, published an article about it on December 6. “The three-day session will cover an introduction to Critical Race Theory concepts, the utilization of CRT in the field of education, and research applications of CRT in K12 classrooms and districts. The final session will be students working in groups to design research questions and choose research methods using CRT as a theoretical framework.” (7) We’re talking about high school students here, not teachers.
There is also a financial side of this issue in Illinois schools. Collectively, Illinois school districts are $7.37 billion short of adequate funding. The legislature and governor verbally committed to increasing K-12 education funding by $350 million each year over 10 years. (8) Decisions are forthcoming to spend part of the proposed $350 million allotted for K-12 education on Critical Race material. Four years ago, Illinois overhauled the way it funds K-12 education. The state used to have the most unfair education funding in the nation, according to a 2015 study from The Education Trust, a nonprofit organization that advocates for students. It found low-income schools received significantly less aid than they would in other states. Additionally, after the state decided the amount of funds various districts needed, only a percentage of that was actually sent to the districts because the state has been money strapped.
In 2017, Illinois adopted a new Evidence-Based Funding (EBF) formula for providing new state funding for schools. The new EBF formula estimates what it actually costs to provide a quality education to students in each of Illinois’ 853 school districts (called the adequacy target) as well as the local tax resources available to the district to meet that funding level (their local capacity). State funds are then distributed with more money being directed to the school districts with the largest gap between their local capacity and their adequacy target.
The Evidence-Based Funding formula looks at dozens of factors like the number of English language learners and special education teachers to come up with an “adequacy target” of how much the state believes a school should spend. Many districts don’t have enough tax revenue coming in for schools. Those schools and schools furthest from their target are prioritized to receive the most state funding. Improvements have been made; thus providing low-income, Black, and English-learning students still see the largest funding gaps. (9)
As part of the new funding law, a Professional Review Panel was created to oversee implementation. The Evidence-Based Funding Professional Review Panel is a group of practitioners, experts, legislative leaders, and advocates tasked with reviewing the funding reform implementation, as mandated by the 2017 law. At their next meeting on December 13, 2021, members will consider proposals for spending that $350 million. Member information is included here to gain understanding of the decision-making dynamics. The twenty-one current Panel members (10) include Dr. Carmen Ayala, State Superintendent of Education; Rep. Avery Bourne; Rep. Willian Davis; Sen. Kimberly Lightford; Ralph Martire, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability; Cameron Mock, Office of the Governor; Jane Russell, Illinois Federation of Teachers; Robin Steans, Advance Illinois, a charitable organization dedicated to “confronting the severe inequities in our entire education continuum;” (11) Jessica Handy, Stand for Children Illinois, a nonprofit education advocacy group particularly for children of color; (12) and twelve board members who are superintendents and representatives from various school districts; (only one from Southern Illinois). Information was not found regarding voting and non-voting members but apparently Representatives Davis and Bourne are non-voting members of the review panel.
This panel will meet December 13 with suggestions on how to spend $350 million of new funding for K-12 schools in the coming fiscal year. Some have expressed concern that proposals could alter the bipartisan funding formula. In fact, a scheduled December 3 meeting was rescheduled for December 13 to allow more time for the group to solidify findings. Funding proposals for implicit bias and antiracism training in schools are coming into focus with the Illinois State Board of Education. The Panel recommendations include things like teaching a foreign language, but there are also suggestions for interventions to have a focus on racial dynamics, equity and increased bias awareness for teachers. (Read that “Critical Race Theory.”)
State Rep. Will Davis, D-Hazel Crest, defended the proposals. “It’s about looking at equity, looking at inclusion, looking at how we’re serving kids of color, providing additional opportunities particularly for kids in those under-resourced schools.” The draft proposals “recognize that students of color do not inherently need additional supports by nature of their race/ethnicity, but that these students do face inequities because of historical and existing structures, and there is a cost attendant with working to dismantle those inequities through training on antiracism and eliminating implicit bias within schools and districts.” To address that, the proposal adds “a specific Professional Development cost … related to implicit bias and antiracism at a fixed per-pupil cost based on overall enrollment, with additional per-pupil dollar amount for all students where a district serves over 50% non-white students.” (13)
State Rep. Avery Bourne, R-Morrisonville, warned such changes could divert money to Chicago-area schools, going against the evidence-based funding model approved several years ago. “The school funding formula was a bipartisan win and further politicizing that is, I think, a disservice to kids,” Bourne said in an interview. “We need to look at what helps schools statewide, every school’s individual needs, and I’m not interested in individual carve-outs or special deals that are done under the guise of being politically correct.” Bourne also said the focus should be more on educating children. (14)
In conclusion, critical race theory in indeed beginning to be overtly taught in Illinois schools as well as being covertly taught through teacher indoctrination and school funding.
End Notes:
(1) https://illinoisfamily.org/education/some-crucial-questions-for-proponents-and-opponents-of-crt/
(2) https://parentsforamerica.com/2021/10/yes-illinois-state-board-of-educations-culturally-responsive-teaching-and-leading-standards-include-principles-of-critical-race-theory/
(3) https://nypost.com/2021/02/05/website-tracks-where-critical-race-theory-taught-at-us-schools/
(4) https://criticalrace.org/
(5) https://illinoisfamily.org/education/despite-nationwide-condemnation-illinois-passes-controversial-leftist-teacher-training-mandate/
(6) https://cemast.illinoisstate.edu/
(7) IFI News takeaction@illinoisfamily.org via votervoice.net December 6, 2021
(8) https://onevoiceillinois.com/2018/10/25/5-things-to-know-about-illinoiss-new-school-funding-formula/
(9) https://illinoisnewsroom.org/has-evidence-based-funding-made-education-in-illinois-more-equitable/
(10) https://www.isbe.net/prp
(11) https://www.advanceillinois.org/about-us/supporters/
(12) https://www.advanceillinois.org/about-us/supporters/
(13) https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/lawmakers-discuss-proposals-for-spending-additional-350-million-for-k-12/article_b40062be-5479-11ec-9381-9ff466fd024d.html
(14) https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/lawmakers-discuss-proposals-for-spending-additional-350-million-for-k-12/article_b40062be-5479-11ec-9381-9ff466fd024d.html
By Joyce Geiler
Are classes being taught through the lens of Critical Race Theory (CRT) or are teachers being informed by CRT? It is the viewpoint of the black civil rights leader Bob Woodson that CRT is “explicitly and implicitly a racist approach to education,” and that approach is increasingly infiltrating our schools. One could say technically CRT is not being taught in the classroom because it is not distributed in the form of a textbook; but nonetheless, volumes have been written on critical race theory and its influence and its tenants are in our schools. (1)
Parents for America has an excellent article on how to understand CRT’s influence and tenants in schools. (2) A Cornell Law School professor has launched a new website about critical race theory curriculum in the US that features a state-by-state list of more than 200 colleges and universities promoting critical race theory. (3) On that website, one can click on any state and find schools and information about critical race theory in that state. (4)
(The reader may remember that article earlier this year reported on the approval of the Illinois State Board of Education Standards to infuse the assumptions of Critical Race Theory/ identity politics/BLM into: 1. all teacher-training programs; 2. all Professional Education Licensing (PEL); and 3. indirectly into all public-school classrooms. More information on this topic can also be found at this IFI link (5) https://illinoisfamily.org/education/despite-nationwide-condemnation-illinois-passes-controversial-leftist-teacher-training-mandate/)
As of this writing, it is known that the following two major Illinois school settings ARE overtly teaching Critical Race Theory precepts:
1. The Center for Mathematics, Science, & Technology at Illinois State University has issued a statement standing in solidarity with those protesting racism and injustice now and at all times. The Center states it is committed to providing equitable, anti-racist STEM education that allows all students to fulfill their potential in STEM disciplines. (6)
2. An Illinois high school, the Illinois Science and Mathematics Academy, a top rated, public, magnet school in Aurora that proposes to develop creative, ethical leaders in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, is offering a course titled “Introduction to Critical Race Theory in Education Research.” Laurie Higgins, writer for Illinois Family Institute, published an article about it on December 6. “The three-day session will cover an introduction to Critical Race Theory concepts, the utilization of CRT in the field of education, and research applications of CRT in K12 classrooms and districts. The final session will be students working in groups to design research questions and choose research methods using CRT as a theoretical framework.” (7) We’re talking about high school students here, not teachers.
There is also a financial side of this issue in Illinois schools. Collectively, Illinois school districts are $7.37 billion short of adequate funding. The legislature and governor verbally committed to increasing K-12 education funding by $350 million each year over 10 years. (8) Decisions are forthcoming to spend part of the proposed $350 million allotted for K-12 education on Critical Race material. Four years ago, Illinois overhauled the way it funds K-12 education. The state used to have the most unfair education funding in the nation, according to a 2015 study from The Education Trust, a nonprofit organization that advocates for students. It found low-income schools received significantly less aid than they would in other states. Additionally, after the state decided the amount of funds various districts needed, only a percentage of that was actually sent to the districts because the state has been money strapped.
In 2017, Illinois adopted a new Evidence-Based Funding (EBF) formula for providing new state funding for schools. The new EBF formula estimates what it actually costs to provide a quality education to students in each of Illinois’ 853 school districts (called the adequacy target) as well as the local tax resources available to the district to meet that funding level (their local capacity). State funds are then distributed with more money being directed to the school districts with the largest gap between their local capacity and their adequacy target.
The Evidence-Based Funding formula looks at dozens of factors like the number of English language learners and special education teachers to come up with an “adequacy target” of how much the state believes a school should spend. Many districts don’t have enough tax revenue coming in for schools. Those schools and schools furthest from their target are prioritized to receive the most state funding. Improvements have been made; thus providing low-income, Black, and English-learning students still see the largest funding gaps. (9)
As part of the new funding law, a Professional Review Panel was created to oversee implementation. The Evidence-Based Funding Professional Review Panel is a group of practitioners, experts, legislative leaders, and advocates tasked with reviewing the funding reform implementation, as mandated by the 2017 law. At their next meeting on December 13, 2021, members will consider proposals for spending that $350 million. Member information is included here to gain understanding of the decision-making dynamics. The twenty-one current Panel members (10) include Dr. Carmen Ayala, State Superintendent of Education; Rep. Avery Bourne; Rep. Willian Davis; Sen. Kimberly Lightford; Ralph Martire, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability; Cameron Mock, Office of the Governor; Jane Russell, Illinois Federation of Teachers; Robin Steans, Advance Illinois, a charitable organization dedicated to “confronting the severe inequities in our entire education continuum;” (11) Jessica Handy, Stand for Children Illinois, a nonprofit education advocacy group particularly for children of color; (12) and twelve board members who are superintendents and representatives from various school districts; (only one from Southern Illinois). Information was not found regarding voting and non-voting members but apparently Representatives Davis and Bourne are non-voting members of the review panel.
This panel will meet December 13 with suggestions on how to spend $350 million of new funding for K-12 schools in the coming fiscal year. Some have expressed concern that proposals could alter the bipartisan funding formula. In fact, a scheduled December 3 meeting was rescheduled for December 13 to allow more time for the group to solidify findings. Funding proposals for implicit bias and antiracism training in schools are coming into focus with the Illinois State Board of Education. The Panel recommendations include things like teaching a foreign language, but there are also suggestions for interventions to have a focus on racial dynamics, equity and increased bias awareness for teachers. (Read that “Critical Race Theory.”)
State Rep. Will Davis, D-Hazel Crest, defended the proposals. “It’s about looking at equity, looking at inclusion, looking at how we’re serving kids of color, providing additional opportunities particularly for kids in those under-resourced schools.” The draft proposals “recognize that students of color do not inherently need additional supports by nature of their race/ethnicity, but that these students do face inequities because of historical and existing structures, and there is a cost attendant with working to dismantle those inequities through training on antiracism and eliminating implicit bias within schools and districts.” To address that, the proposal adds “a specific Professional Development cost … related to implicit bias and antiracism at a fixed per-pupil cost based on overall enrollment, with additional per-pupil dollar amount for all students where a district serves over 50% non-white students.” (13)
State Rep. Avery Bourne, R-Morrisonville, warned such changes could divert money to Chicago-area schools, going against the evidence-based funding model approved several years ago. “The school funding formula was a bipartisan win and further politicizing that is, I think, a disservice to kids,” Bourne said in an interview. “We need to look at what helps schools statewide, every school’s individual needs, and I’m not interested in individual carve-outs or special deals that are done under the guise of being politically correct.” Bourne also said the focus should be more on educating children. (14)
In conclusion, critical race theory in indeed beginning to be overtly taught in Illinois schools as well as being covertly taught through teacher indoctrination and school funding.
End Notes:
(1) https://illinoisfamily.org/education/some-crucial-questions-for-proponents-and-opponents-of-crt/
(2) https://parentsforamerica.com/2021/10/yes-illinois-state-board-of-educations-culturally-responsive-teaching-and-leading-standards-include-principles-of-critical-race-theory/
(3) https://nypost.com/2021/02/05/website-tracks-where-critical-race-theory-taught-at-us-schools/
(4) https://criticalrace.org/
(5) https://illinoisfamily.org/education/despite-nationwide-condemnation-illinois-passes-controversial-leftist-teacher-training-mandate/
(6) https://cemast.illinoisstate.edu/
(7) IFI News takeaction@illinoisfamily.org via votervoice.net December 6, 2021
(8) https://onevoiceillinois.com/2018/10/25/5-things-to-know-about-illinoiss-new-school-funding-formula/
(9) https://illinoisnewsroom.org/has-evidence-based-funding-made-education-in-illinois-more-equitable/
(10) https://www.isbe.net/prp
(11) https://www.advanceillinois.org/about-us/supporters/
(12) https://www.advanceillinois.org/about-us/supporters/
(13) https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/lawmakers-discuss-proposals-for-spending-additional-350-million-for-k-12/article_b40062be-5479-11ec-9381-9ff466fd024d.html
(14) https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/lawmakers-discuss-proposals-for-spending-additional-350-million-for-k-12/article_b40062be-5479-11ec-9381-9ff466fd024d.html
Parents VS Government and Big Pharma
By Joyce Geiler
Governor Pritzker continues to make decisions about the welfare of Illinois’ children. Decisions that kept children home from school for nearly an entire school year, decisions that now mandate masks for school children, and decisions that could come regarding covid shots for children. Many of these decisions have not considered the right of the parents and guardians to make choices regarding their children. Many of the decisions have negatively impacted the children. The impact of those decisions is now becoming more visible.
According to State Superintendent Carmen Ayala, COVID-19 restrictions on in-person learning had a “significant impact” on attendance and consequential reliance on remote learning. While Illinois, like other states, experienced a small shift to homeschooling, 20% of public-school remote learning students were absent from class so often they were considered chronically truant. (1) The Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE) report card notes that as a result, nearly 20% fewer students met math and English proficiency standards. (2) The ISBE annually releases an Illinois Report Card that shows how the state, and each school and district, are progressing on a wide range of educational goals. (3)
Gov. Pritzker issued a statement that Illinois’ 2021 report card illustrates “the tremendous challenges the pandemic has created for school-aged children the world over.” Acknowledging said challenge doesn’t seem to affect his continued mask mandate. Pritzker’s statewide school mask mandate remains in effect, with no end date established. He initially said he would let local school districts decide whether masking was right for their students, but weeks later he imposed the mandate, saying too few districts were meeting his definition of the correct choice.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends universal masking for all students, staff and visitors in U.S. schools. Masks impact language and social-emotional learning for some students, so some schools have resisted forcing students to wear them and faced swift punishment from Pritzker’s administration in the form of threats of accreditation removal and no sports participation. (4) Illinois schools have received more than $7 billion in federal funding to address the impact of the pandemic on student outcomes. One wonders how the effects have been addressed with those funds.
Currently, a discussion is held about giving the covid shot to 5-year-olds? The Illinois' health department released its plans for coronavirus “vaccinations” for kids as young as 5 just one day after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended the shots. The Illinois Department of Public Health said on November 3 that it plans to align with the CDC's recent guidance for youngsters age 5 to 11 to get kid-size doses of the vaccine made by Pfizer and its partner BioNTech.
Former Surgeon General and neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson thinks giving covid shots to children is absurd, saying in an interview with Maria Bartiromo “absolutely not” due to the kids’ extremely low mortality rate and because it is “a giant experiment.” (5) According to a 2012 double-blind, randomized, controlled trial conducted in healthy children 6 to 15 years of age, getting a flu shot was found to increase the risk of other respiratory viral infections over four-fold. (6) Similar trials with covid shots have not been conducted. The FDA has admitted it does not know the long-term effects on kids. (7) Note that the FDA board is stacked with people that were formerly working for Pfizer in some capacity, got grants from Pfizer, etc. Pfizer uses 83 lobbyists to bend legislation their way with our politicians.
Although CDC data shows covid poses virtually no danger to children, (8) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, which includes many thousands of reports of death following administration of the shots, suggests there are enormous risks from the injection. (9) Most importantly, however, no long-term safety data exists for children and the experimental jab.
The Food and Drug Administration authorization of a vaccine makes 28 million unvaccinated young children in the country, including 1.1 million in Illinois, now eligible for the covid shot. A new study by Nick VinZant at QuoteWizard reveals multiple reasons why some parents are saying no to the shot for their children. “The main reasons that we found nationwide and in Illinois are people are concerned about the side effects, they’re waiting to see if the vaccine is safe, they don’t believe that their child needs to get vaccinated, they don’t trust the government, or they simply don’t vaccinate their children period,” VinZant said.
The study reported that a large percentage of Illinois parents were worried about side effects from the vaccine, but the mood is changing. “Initially, 82% of people who said they weren’t going to vaccinate their children said they were concerned about the side effects and that was the reason why,” VinZant said. “That number has now dropped to 56%.” (10)
Gov. Pritzker's office said more than 2,200 providers statewide are already enrolled to provide the vaccine to children, and the state expects to receive 306,000 doses, with 100,000 doses to pharmacies. The outreach effort will also go directly to schools, Pritzker said. “We will be reaching out to approximately 750 public school districts that teach elementary-aged students to offer them the opportunity to host parent-approved clinics right on school grounds,” he said.
Illinois Department of Public Health Director Dr. Ngozi Ezike said the department has begun planning vaccination events. There is a push to get children to roll up their sleeves. The Chicago Public School officials have canceled all classes on November 12 for “Vaccine Awareness Day,” an effort to boost vaccinations among younger students. Chicago kids ages 5 to 11 are also being offered an incentive to get their vaccinations. When they get their shots at Chicago Public Health events or clinics, the kids are eligible for $100 in gift cards. (11)
Big Pharma has bypassed parental wisdom and has created propaganda for kids, using kids. At this link, (12) you can view this disturbing ad by Pfizer telling kids they'll get superpowers from the covid jab. Parents must protect their God-ordained sphere of authority for their families. Government and Big Pharma are quite willing to overstep their jurisdictional authority and relieve parents of their right and responsibility for making decisions concerning the welfare of their children.
End Notes:
1) https://www.illinoispolicy.org/1-in-5-illinois-students-chronically-truant-thanks-to-covid-19-mandates/
2) https://www.isbe.net/ilreportcarddata
3) https://www.isbe.net/Pages/IL-Report-Card.aspx
4) https://www.illinoispolicy.org/1-in-5-illinois-students-chronically-truant-thanks-to-covid-19-mandates/
5) https://nationalfile.com/ben-carson-cdc-should-absolutely-not-approve-vaxxing-kids-covid-19-vaccine-is-a-giant-experiment/
6) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/
7) https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-advisory-panel-oks-pfizer-vaccine-kids-5-11-rcna3726
8) https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/10/31/theres-no-case-for-vaccinating-children-the-fda-meeting-proves-it/
9) https://openvaers.com/covid-data
10) https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/study-shows-parents-shifting-viewpoints-on-vaccinating-young-children/article_f860d76c-3e63-11ec-aea8-e373161fe1fc.html
11) https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/study-shows-parents-shifting-viewpoints-on-vaccinating-young-children/article_f860d76c-3e63-11ec-aea8-e373161fe1fc.html
12) https://maganews2020.org/2021/11/07/pure-evil-disturbing-pfizer-ad-tells-kids-theyll-get-superpowers-from-cvd-jab/
By Joyce Geiler
Governor Pritzker continues to make decisions about the welfare of Illinois’ children. Decisions that kept children home from school for nearly an entire school year, decisions that now mandate masks for school children, and decisions that could come regarding covid shots for children. Many of these decisions have not considered the right of the parents and guardians to make choices regarding their children. Many of the decisions have negatively impacted the children. The impact of those decisions is now becoming more visible.
According to State Superintendent Carmen Ayala, COVID-19 restrictions on in-person learning had a “significant impact” on attendance and consequential reliance on remote learning. While Illinois, like other states, experienced a small shift to homeschooling, 20% of public-school remote learning students were absent from class so often they were considered chronically truant. (1) The Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE) report card notes that as a result, nearly 20% fewer students met math and English proficiency standards. (2) The ISBE annually releases an Illinois Report Card that shows how the state, and each school and district, are progressing on a wide range of educational goals. (3)
Gov. Pritzker issued a statement that Illinois’ 2021 report card illustrates “the tremendous challenges the pandemic has created for school-aged children the world over.” Acknowledging said challenge doesn’t seem to affect his continued mask mandate. Pritzker’s statewide school mask mandate remains in effect, with no end date established. He initially said he would let local school districts decide whether masking was right for their students, but weeks later he imposed the mandate, saying too few districts were meeting his definition of the correct choice.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends universal masking for all students, staff and visitors in U.S. schools. Masks impact language and social-emotional learning for some students, so some schools have resisted forcing students to wear them and faced swift punishment from Pritzker’s administration in the form of threats of accreditation removal and no sports participation. (4) Illinois schools have received more than $7 billion in federal funding to address the impact of the pandemic on student outcomes. One wonders how the effects have been addressed with those funds.
Currently, a discussion is held about giving the covid shot to 5-year-olds? The Illinois' health department released its plans for coronavirus “vaccinations” for kids as young as 5 just one day after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended the shots. The Illinois Department of Public Health said on November 3 that it plans to align with the CDC's recent guidance for youngsters age 5 to 11 to get kid-size doses of the vaccine made by Pfizer and its partner BioNTech.
Former Surgeon General and neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson thinks giving covid shots to children is absurd, saying in an interview with Maria Bartiromo “absolutely not” due to the kids’ extremely low mortality rate and because it is “a giant experiment.” (5) According to a 2012 double-blind, randomized, controlled trial conducted in healthy children 6 to 15 years of age, getting a flu shot was found to increase the risk of other respiratory viral infections over four-fold. (6) Similar trials with covid shots have not been conducted. The FDA has admitted it does not know the long-term effects on kids. (7) Note that the FDA board is stacked with people that were formerly working for Pfizer in some capacity, got grants from Pfizer, etc. Pfizer uses 83 lobbyists to bend legislation their way with our politicians.
Although CDC data shows covid poses virtually no danger to children, (8) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, which includes many thousands of reports of death following administration of the shots, suggests there are enormous risks from the injection. (9) Most importantly, however, no long-term safety data exists for children and the experimental jab.
The Food and Drug Administration authorization of a vaccine makes 28 million unvaccinated young children in the country, including 1.1 million in Illinois, now eligible for the covid shot. A new study by Nick VinZant at QuoteWizard reveals multiple reasons why some parents are saying no to the shot for their children. “The main reasons that we found nationwide and in Illinois are people are concerned about the side effects, they’re waiting to see if the vaccine is safe, they don’t believe that their child needs to get vaccinated, they don’t trust the government, or they simply don’t vaccinate their children period,” VinZant said.
The study reported that a large percentage of Illinois parents were worried about side effects from the vaccine, but the mood is changing. “Initially, 82% of people who said they weren’t going to vaccinate their children said they were concerned about the side effects and that was the reason why,” VinZant said. “That number has now dropped to 56%.” (10)
Gov. Pritzker's office said more than 2,200 providers statewide are already enrolled to provide the vaccine to children, and the state expects to receive 306,000 doses, with 100,000 doses to pharmacies. The outreach effort will also go directly to schools, Pritzker said. “We will be reaching out to approximately 750 public school districts that teach elementary-aged students to offer them the opportunity to host parent-approved clinics right on school grounds,” he said.
Illinois Department of Public Health Director Dr. Ngozi Ezike said the department has begun planning vaccination events. There is a push to get children to roll up their sleeves. The Chicago Public School officials have canceled all classes on November 12 for “Vaccine Awareness Day,” an effort to boost vaccinations among younger students. Chicago kids ages 5 to 11 are also being offered an incentive to get their vaccinations. When they get their shots at Chicago Public Health events or clinics, the kids are eligible for $100 in gift cards. (11)
Big Pharma has bypassed parental wisdom and has created propaganda for kids, using kids. At this link, (12) you can view this disturbing ad by Pfizer telling kids they'll get superpowers from the covid jab. Parents must protect their God-ordained sphere of authority for their families. Government and Big Pharma are quite willing to overstep their jurisdictional authority and relieve parents of their right and responsibility for making decisions concerning the welfare of their children.
End Notes:
1) https://www.illinoispolicy.org/1-in-5-illinois-students-chronically-truant-thanks-to-covid-19-mandates/
2) https://www.isbe.net/ilreportcarddata
3) https://www.isbe.net/Pages/IL-Report-Card.aspx
4) https://www.illinoispolicy.org/1-in-5-illinois-students-chronically-truant-thanks-to-covid-19-mandates/
5) https://nationalfile.com/ben-carson-cdc-should-absolutely-not-approve-vaxxing-kids-covid-19-vaccine-is-a-giant-experiment/
6) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/
7) https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-advisory-panel-oks-pfizer-vaccine-kids-5-11-rcna3726
8) https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/10/31/theres-no-case-for-vaccinating-children-the-fda-meeting-proves-it/
9) https://openvaers.com/covid-data
10) https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/study-shows-parents-shifting-viewpoints-on-vaccinating-young-children/article_f860d76c-3e63-11ec-aea8-e373161fe1fc.html
11) https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/study-shows-parents-shifting-viewpoints-on-vaccinating-young-children/article_f860d76c-3e63-11ec-aea8-e373161fe1fc.html
12) https://maganews2020.org/2021/11/07/pure-evil-disturbing-pfizer-ad-tells-kids-theyll-get-superpowers-from-cvd-jab/
Back Door Tactics Used by Illinois Legislators
By Joyce Geiler
Many readers are aware that during the current veto session of the Illinois General Assembly, pending legislation included HB 1797, the REPEAL of PARENTAL NOTIFICATION of ABORTION ACT. On October 27, Parental Notification of Abortion was essentially repealed by both chambers of the General Assembly and sent to the governor for his signature that will make it law. HB 1797 that was named as the Repeal of Parental Notification was not the bill that accomplished the repeal. As it (HB 1797) stalled in the process, legislators attempted backdoor tactics through two other bills, HB 3173 and HB 370, ultimately succeeding in the repeal with the third bill, HB 370.
What does all this mean? What is the normal legislative process and how can there be a backdoor that allows legislation to be sneaked in, so to speak? This article will attempt to explain the overall legislative process and then discuss how legislative back door tactics were used to repeal the Parental Notification Act. This article is longer than usual but it very important for understanding what is happening in Illinois.
Legislative Process Overview
The following is the overall process to get legislation passed: 1) introduction of a bill, 2) pass out of committee, 3) pass both chambers of the General Assembly and 4) get the signature of the governor. In actuality, many other steps are involved to accomplish those four steps.
Bills may be introduced into either the Senate or House and are designated by SB for senate introduced and HB for House introduced. Bills must be scheduled and read three times to the chamber in which they were introduced. On the first reading the bill and its number are officially read aloud. Then the bill is assigned to committee. House bills are initially assigned to the Rules Committee and Senate bills are given to the Assignments Committee. These groups look at each bill that is introduced and decide if it will be assigned to another committee and if so, to which committee. There are 29 standing committees in the Senate and 49 in the House.
In committee, the sponsor of the bill explains it and members can ask questions and amendments can be added. Amendments can be simple technical corrections or extensive changes. A simple majority is required for the bill to pass out of committee. If the vote doesn’t pass the bill on, it usually dies although it can still be voted on at a later date.
Bills that are passed out of committee go to the full chamber for the second reading at which time the title and bill number are read and legislators are informed if any amendments have been filed. Bills can still be amended at this stage, and the bill must still pass a vote after a third reading. If it is approved, the bill and amendments, called an “engrossed” bill, are sent to the other chamber where the entire process is repeated.
If the second chamber passes the same version of the bill as the engrossed bill (meaning, no amendments were adopted in the second chamber), then the bill has passed the General Assembly and is sent to the Governor for his signature to sign the bill into law.
If, however, the second chamber added any amendments to the bill, it must return to the house of origin because the bill must pass both houses in the exact same form to be sent to the governor. If the second chamber has added any amendments, the first chamber can vote to add the amendments; and the bill is sent on to the governor. If the added amendments are not agreed upon by the first chamber, it goes back to the second where more committees are involved until it is all sorted out.
When a bill reaches the governor, he has three choices. He can take no action for 60 days and the bill automatically becomes law. He can sign the bill into law as it is. Thirdly, he can veto the bill in whole or in part, in which case it goes back to the General Assembly. If the General Assembly does not act, the bill is dead. If three-fifths of each chamber overrides the veto, it becomes law. If the governor sent back only an amendatory veto, it takes only a majority vote (not three-fifths) of each chamber on the amended portion to make the entire bill law.
That entire process can be long, so legislators have devised short cuts using two methods. They can tack on an amendment to an existing bill that can contain substantive language that pushes their policy idea forward while skipping much of the typical process. (Substantive provisions grant or impose on a class of persons rights, duties, powers, and privileges and may govern conduct by establishing either a mandate or a prohibition.) (1) Or they attach an idea to a shell bill that has already gone through three readings in the assembly. A shell bill is a legislative bill, which typically has no substantive provisions and which is introduced for purposes of later being amended to include the actual legislative proposals advanced by the introducer. (2) An amendment can be added at any stage and is not required to go through the three times of reading. The Illinois Policy Institute has an excellent podcast on the legislative process. (3) Also, an explanation in simplified table form can be found at this website. (4)
Explaining the process used with the Repeal of the Parental Notice of Abortion Act
Let’s look at how the three bills, HB 1797, HB 3137 and HB 370 traveled through the legislative process until HB 370 finally accomplished what legislators set out to do. HB 1797, the Repeal of Parental Notification had begun its journey in January and progressed slowly through the House and but was sitting in the Rules Committee, apparently making no further progress. In essence, since it appeared HB 1797 was in danger of not being passed, proponents used a back door to try to accomplish their objective. Another bill, HB 3173, a bill dealing with, among other things, the addition of a gun safety course to high school curriculum, was co-opted. Remember amendments to bills do not have to be even remotely related to the original intent of the bill. Anything can be added as an amendment.
HB 3173, which was the bill dealing with gun safety classes, had begun its journey in the House with its first reading on February 19, 2021, its second reading on April 8, 2021 and its third reading on April 22. Subsequently, it was sent to the Senate where it processed through committees there and passed its third reading on October 20, 2021. An October 20 report by Sen. Darren Bailey revealed that amendments had been added to the bill by the Senate. One of those amendments essentially said that if a pregnant student goes to a school employee for help, that employee may NOT tell the parents. October 20 was during the current veto session. This was an obvious maneuver before the end of the veto session to hijack a bill almost ready to be approved. Since the amendment regarding pregnant students, along with 2 other amendments, was added to the House bill while it was in the Senate, the bill had to be returned to the House for approval of those amendments. The inclusion of unrelated amendments designed to repeal or nullify Parental Notification, effectively avoided months of scrutiny by legislators and the public. The routes of HB 3173 and HB 1797 can be viewed at the Illinois General Assembly website. (5) and (6)
On October 26 with the veto session nearly over and, apparently, to ensure that legislation repealing parental notification was approved during the veto session, another bill was hijacked. Notice that the number 370 comes before either 3173 or 1797 meaning HB 370 was a bill introduced earlier than either of the latter two, functioning as a shell bill held in reserve for such a time as this. It began in the House on January 29, 2021 as the PROBATE-GUARDIAN APPOINTMENT. By April 19, it arrived in the Senate and remained inactive for a long time. After the second reading was completed, Senate Floor Amendment 1 was entered on October 26.
Amendment 1, the “YOUTH HEALTH & SAFETY ACT,” contained language to completely repeal Parental Notice of Abortion. The bill was adopted by the Executive Committee and passed the third reading on the same day of October 26. It passed the Senate the next day and was sent back to the House. Look at the history of this bill. (7)
HB 370, the Youth Health and Safety Act, provided for the repeal of the Parental Notification Act. On October 27, the House concurred (8) with the Senate. HB 370 has passed both houses and, therefore, moves to the governor who is eager to sign it into law. In just two days, a determined group of legislators co-opted a bill that was seemingly waiting in reserve and nearly ready to go to the governor. They used that shell bill to get their agenda passed quickly and without citizen awareness.
To review, a bill to repeal Parental Notice of Abortion was introduced but was taking longer to pass than proponents wanted, so they attached an amendment to a different and unrelated bill that was closer to becoming law. When their first back door attempt did not yield rapid enough progress, legislators introduced an amendment to repeal the Parental Notice of Abortion Act to yet a different law to guarantee the passage of the repeal. Without transparency but using backdoor approaches, the legislature succeeded in passing legislation of which the general public of Illinois does not approve. By the way, this same type of back door dealing happens regularly in our federal legislative process, too.
End Notes:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/masterybusinesslaw/chapter/how-to-read-a-bill/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_bill
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/radio/ep-8-what-to-watch-this-week-in-springfield-with-jordan-ryan/
https://guides.library.illinois.edu/c.php?g=347254&p=2342631
https://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=3173&GAID=16&GA=102&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=132098&SessionID=110
https://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=1797&GAID=16&GA=102&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=130507&SessionID=110
https://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=370&GAID=16&GA=102&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=128318&SessionID=110
Davis, Christopher M., Commonly Used Motions and Requests in the House of Representatives, Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process, September 16, 2015 sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL32207.pdf
By Joyce Geiler
Many readers are aware that during the current veto session of the Illinois General Assembly, pending legislation included HB 1797, the REPEAL of PARENTAL NOTIFICATION of ABORTION ACT. On October 27, Parental Notification of Abortion was essentially repealed by both chambers of the General Assembly and sent to the governor for his signature that will make it law. HB 1797 that was named as the Repeal of Parental Notification was not the bill that accomplished the repeal. As it (HB 1797) stalled in the process, legislators attempted backdoor tactics through two other bills, HB 3173 and HB 370, ultimately succeeding in the repeal with the third bill, HB 370.
What does all this mean? What is the normal legislative process and how can there be a backdoor that allows legislation to be sneaked in, so to speak? This article will attempt to explain the overall legislative process and then discuss how legislative back door tactics were used to repeal the Parental Notification Act. This article is longer than usual but it very important for understanding what is happening in Illinois.
Legislative Process Overview
The following is the overall process to get legislation passed: 1) introduction of a bill, 2) pass out of committee, 3) pass both chambers of the General Assembly and 4) get the signature of the governor. In actuality, many other steps are involved to accomplish those four steps.
Bills may be introduced into either the Senate or House and are designated by SB for senate introduced and HB for House introduced. Bills must be scheduled and read three times to the chamber in which they were introduced. On the first reading the bill and its number are officially read aloud. Then the bill is assigned to committee. House bills are initially assigned to the Rules Committee and Senate bills are given to the Assignments Committee. These groups look at each bill that is introduced and decide if it will be assigned to another committee and if so, to which committee. There are 29 standing committees in the Senate and 49 in the House.
In committee, the sponsor of the bill explains it and members can ask questions and amendments can be added. Amendments can be simple technical corrections or extensive changes. A simple majority is required for the bill to pass out of committee. If the vote doesn’t pass the bill on, it usually dies although it can still be voted on at a later date.
Bills that are passed out of committee go to the full chamber for the second reading at which time the title and bill number are read and legislators are informed if any amendments have been filed. Bills can still be amended at this stage, and the bill must still pass a vote after a third reading. If it is approved, the bill and amendments, called an “engrossed” bill, are sent to the other chamber where the entire process is repeated.
If the second chamber passes the same version of the bill as the engrossed bill (meaning, no amendments were adopted in the second chamber), then the bill has passed the General Assembly and is sent to the Governor for his signature to sign the bill into law.
If, however, the second chamber added any amendments to the bill, it must return to the house of origin because the bill must pass both houses in the exact same form to be sent to the governor. If the second chamber has added any amendments, the first chamber can vote to add the amendments; and the bill is sent on to the governor. If the added amendments are not agreed upon by the first chamber, it goes back to the second where more committees are involved until it is all sorted out.
When a bill reaches the governor, he has three choices. He can take no action for 60 days and the bill automatically becomes law. He can sign the bill into law as it is. Thirdly, he can veto the bill in whole or in part, in which case it goes back to the General Assembly. If the General Assembly does not act, the bill is dead. If three-fifths of each chamber overrides the veto, it becomes law. If the governor sent back only an amendatory veto, it takes only a majority vote (not three-fifths) of each chamber on the amended portion to make the entire bill law.
That entire process can be long, so legislators have devised short cuts using two methods. They can tack on an amendment to an existing bill that can contain substantive language that pushes their policy idea forward while skipping much of the typical process. (Substantive provisions grant or impose on a class of persons rights, duties, powers, and privileges and may govern conduct by establishing either a mandate or a prohibition.) (1) Or they attach an idea to a shell bill that has already gone through three readings in the assembly. A shell bill is a legislative bill, which typically has no substantive provisions and which is introduced for purposes of later being amended to include the actual legislative proposals advanced by the introducer. (2) An amendment can be added at any stage and is not required to go through the three times of reading. The Illinois Policy Institute has an excellent podcast on the legislative process. (3) Also, an explanation in simplified table form can be found at this website. (4)
Explaining the process used with the Repeal of the Parental Notice of Abortion Act
Let’s look at how the three bills, HB 1797, HB 3137 and HB 370 traveled through the legislative process until HB 370 finally accomplished what legislators set out to do. HB 1797, the Repeal of Parental Notification had begun its journey in January and progressed slowly through the House and but was sitting in the Rules Committee, apparently making no further progress. In essence, since it appeared HB 1797 was in danger of not being passed, proponents used a back door to try to accomplish their objective. Another bill, HB 3173, a bill dealing with, among other things, the addition of a gun safety course to high school curriculum, was co-opted. Remember amendments to bills do not have to be even remotely related to the original intent of the bill. Anything can be added as an amendment.
HB 3173, which was the bill dealing with gun safety classes, had begun its journey in the House with its first reading on February 19, 2021, its second reading on April 8, 2021 and its third reading on April 22. Subsequently, it was sent to the Senate where it processed through committees there and passed its third reading on October 20, 2021. An October 20 report by Sen. Darren Bailey revealed that amendments had been added to the bill by the Senate. One of those amendments essentially said that if a pregnant student goes to a school employee for help, that employee may NOT tell the parents. October 20 was during the current veto session. This was an obvious maneuver before the end of the veto session to hijack a bill almost ready to be approved. Since the amendment regarding pregnant students, along with 2 other amendments, was added to the House bill while it was in the Senate, the bill had to be returned to the House for approval of those amendments. The inclusion of unrelated amendments designed to repeal or nullify Parental Notification, effectively avoided months of scrutiny by legislators and the public. The routes of HB 3173 and HB 1797 can be viewed at the Illinois General Assembly website. (5) and (6)
On October 26 with the veto session nearly over and, apparently, to ensure that legislation repealing parental notification was approved during the veto session, another bill was hijacked. Notice that the number 370 comes before either 3173 or 1797 meaning HB 370 was a bill introduced earlier than either of the latter two, functioning as a shell bill held in reserve for such a time as this. It began in the House on January 29, 2021 as the PROBATE-GUARDIAN APPOINTMENT. By April 19, it arrived in the Senate and remained inactive for a long time. After the second reading was completed, Senate Floor Amendment 1 was entered on October 26.
Amendment 1, the “YOUTH HEALTH & SAFETY ACT,” contained language to completely repeal Parental Notice of Abortion. The bill was adopted by the Executive Committee and passed the third reading on the same day of October 26. It passed the Senate the next day and was sent back to the House. Look at the history of this bill. (7)
HB 370, the Youth Health and Safety Act, provided for the repeal of the Parental Notification Act. On October 27, the House concurred (8) with the Senate. HB 370 has passed both houses and, therefore, moves to the governor who is eager to sign it into law. In just two days, a determined group of legislators co-opted a bill that was seemingly waiting in reserve and nearly ready to go to the governor. They used that shell bill to get their agenda passed quickly and without citizen awareness.
To review, a bill to repeal Parental Notice of Abortion was introduced but was taking longer to pass than proponents wanted, so they attached an amendment to a different and unrelated bill that was closer to becoming law. When their first back door attempt did not yield rapid enough progress, legislators introduced an amendment to repeal the Parental Notice of Abortion Act to yet a different law to guarantee the passage of the repeal. Without transparency but using backdoor approaches, the legislature succeeded in passing legislation of which the general public of Illinois does not approve. By the way, this same type of back door dealing happens regularly in our federal legislative process, too.
End Notes:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/masterybusinesslaw/chapter/how-to-read-a-bill/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_bill
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/radio/ep-8-what-to-watch-this-week-in-springfield-with-jordan-ryan/
https://guides.library.illinois.edu/c.php?g=347254&p=2342631
https://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=3173&GAID=16&GA=102&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=132098&SessionID=110
https://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=1797&GAID=16&GA=102&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=130507&SessionID=110
https://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=370&GAID=16&GA=102&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=128318&SessionID=110
Davis, Christopher M., Commonly Used Motions and Requests in the House of Representatives, Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process, September 16, 2015 sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL32207.pdf
Respect Life VS Repeal Parental Notification
By Joyce Geiler
Since 1972 various “Respect Life” efforts have been undertaken in the Catholic Church in the United States. October has traditionally been observed as Respect Life Month, and the first Sunday of October is designated as Respect Life Sunday. (1) To support these annual observances, the church provides materials to help Catholics understand and value the gift of human life and help build a culture that cherishes and protects it. Materials include webinars, prayer cards and action guides. (2)
On an opposing front, Illinois is faced with the assembling of congress in its annual veto session this month, during which the Illinois Family Institute notes “abortion cheerleaders continue to push their sinister agenda to make Illinois the most pro-abortion state in the nation.” While the Illinois Family Institute is encouraging Illinoisans to contact their lawmakers to protect the Parental Notice of Abortion (3), Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Illinois are encouraging their followers to contact their lawmakers to repeal the law. (4)
Under the Parental Notice of Abortion Act, a doctor providing care to a young person under age 18 seeking an abortion in Illinois must notify a designated adult family member – a parent, grandparent, step-parent living in the home, or legal guardian – at least 48 hours in advance of the procedure. If there is a reason that the young person is not able to have one of these family members notified, the young person can go to court and ask a judge for permission to have the procedure without this family involvement in a process known as “judicial bypass.”
Human Rights Watch declares “this law may force young people to continue pregnancies against their will or to endure abuse, humiliation, and punishment by unsupportive parents. And their alternative as they try to make decisions about their own bodies and lives may be to face a difficult and even traumatizing court experience.” (5)
The ACLU of Illinois operates a Judicial Bypass Coordination Project to provide free legal assistance to youth impacted by the law. More than 500 young people in the past seven years have been represented through this venue since the law went into effect in judicial bypass proceedings around the state. Of this number, only one young person’s request for a bypass was ultimately denied. The ACLU states, “After years of representing young people before judges in bypass cases around the state of Illinois, it is clear that this law is unnecessary and harmful.” They underscore their position by arguing that working with a lawyer and surreptitiously arranging for a court appearance adds a week on average (and sometimes much more) to a young person’s timeline of obtaining abortion care. Those days can be critical – a young person may pass the point of eligibility for a noninvasive medication abortion or may need a procedure requiring multiple appointments over consecutive days. Earlier this year, Illinois State Senator Elgie R. Sims, Jr. and State Representative Anna Moeller introduced measures in both Illinois General Assembly chambers aimed at repealing this law – SB 2190 and HB 1797, respectively. (6) The bills were not passed but these two organizations vow to continue to work on this legislation.
The State Journal Register reports that, "Hundreds attended a rally at the Old State Capitol Saturday (October 2) organized by Planned Parenthood of Illinois, and calling for the repeal of abortion-related laws in Texas and Illinois. The Texas law, which allows citizens to sue anyone aiding in an abortion, is being challenged by the U.S. Department of Justice and considered by the rally's organizers as setting a precedent that is an affront to access to abortions everywhere. Illinois is one of 38 states to require parental notice without a court order.” The article goes on to report: “There were more than 600 rallies nationwide calling for less restrictions and free access to abortions in the country in the aftermath of the Texas law, which went into effect Sept. 1. Arguments were made in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Texas on Friday to block the law. Rally organizers, workers and speakers included ACLU Springfield, Action Illinois, Black Lives Matter SPI, Coalition of Rainbow Alliances (CORAL) Springfield, Planned Parenthood Illinois Action, Resistor Sisterhood, The Sangamon Valley Group of the Sierra Club and Springfield Call 2 ACTion, League of Women Voters of Illinois, Abraham Lincoln Unitarian Universalist Church, and the Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence.” (7) The Pantagraph, which is a Bloomington newpaper, reporting on the rallies said, “Thousands in Illinois rally for abortion rights, oppose Texas curbs.” (8)
On September 2, Illinois Gov. Pritzker said that he’s “very concerned” about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision not to block the new Texas law banning most abortions in the state, and vowed Illinois would continue to welcome women from elsewhere who need reproductive health care making “Illinois a beacon of hope for women who need reproductive health.” (9)
In recent years, Illinois has expanded abortion rights in anticipation of Supreme Court challenges. In 2019, Pritzker signed sweeping legislation that established women’s access to the procedure as a “fundamental right” and required insurance coverage for abortion, contraception and related medical care. The law voided decades-old abortion regulations that were on the books but hadn’t taken effect because of court orders, including restrictions on late-term abortions and criminal penalties for doctors who performed them. Activists and Democratic leaders called the protection of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision a critical matter because of the conservative shift on the Supreme Court and because prohibitions in other states could lead to overturning of that decision which legalized abortion nationwide.
The number of out-of-state residents who have sought abortions in Illinois has increased each year since 2014, which then amounted to 2,970 out of a total 38,472 abortions in the state, according to the Illinois Department of public Health. In 2019, the latest data available, there were roughly 7,500 women crossing state lines, making up about 16% of the roughly 46,500 abortions in Illinois that year. (10)
Illinois Right to Life Action notes that minor girls cannot get their ears pierced or go on a field trip without their parents’ consent. Basic common sense might seem to suggest that parents should be notified before their child undergoes something as life-changing and life-ending as an abortion. Most Illinoisans agree with that opinion. A Tarrance Poll taken last March found that a 72% of Illinois voters support keeping Parental Notification of Abortion in place. This includes 55% of voters who identified as “pro-choice”. (11)
On October 2, pro-abortion followers demonstrated for a repeal of the Parental Notification Law. The following day, October 3, the Catholic Church celebrated Respect Life Month. Abortion is possibly the most divisive topic in America today. The repeal of the Parental Notification Act could likely be brought to a vote during the Illinois General Assembly Fall Veto Session, which is October 19-21 and 26-28.
As people who believe in the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death, let us make our voices heard – to God through prayer and fasting and to our government leaders by contacting them. The following links for the Illinois Family Institute
https://www.votervoice.net/ILFI/campaigns/70222/respond
and Illinois Right to Life Action https://illinoisrighttolifeaction.org/2021/03/12/action-alert-anti-life-bills-threaten-parental-rights/
provide a means to do that.
End Notes:
1 https://www.catholicaction.org/respect_life_month#:~:text=April%2017%2C%202019%20Since%201972%20various%20%E2%80%9CRespect%20Life%E2%80%9D,has%20traditionally%20been%20observed%20as%20Respect%20Life%20Month
2 https://www.respectlife.org/respect-life-month
3 IFI E-Alert takeaction@illinoisfamily.org via votervoice.net
4 https://www.aclu-il.org/en/news/illinois-repeal-forced-parental-notice-abortion
5 https://www.aclu-il.org/en/news/illinois-repeal-forced-parental-notice-abortion
6 https://www.aclu-il.org/en/news/illinois-repeal-forced-parental-notice-abortion
7 https://www.sj-r.com/story/news/2021/10/02/planned-parenthood-abortion-law-protest-springfield/5948510001/
9 https://apnews.com/article/abortion-health-us-supreme-court-illinois-f1a03ad9c1ba5dbce1293796aa72dcf8
10 https://apnews.com/article/abortion-health-us-supreme-court-illinois-f1a03ad9c1ba5dbce1293796aa72dcf8
11 https://illinoisrighttolifeaction.org/2021/03/12/action-alert-anti-life-bills-threaten-parental-rights/
By Joyce Geiler
Since 1972 various “Respect Life” efforts have been undertaken in the Catholic Church in the United States. October has traditionally been observed as Respect Life Month, and the first Sunday of October is designated as Respect Life Sunday. (1) To support these annual observances, the church provides materials to help Catholics understand and value the gift of human life and help build a culture that cherishes and protects it. Materials include webinars, prayer cards and action guides. (2)
On an opposing front, Illinois is faced with the assembling of congress in its annual veto session this month, during which the Illinois Family Institute notes “abortion cheerleaders continue to push their sinister agenda to make Illinois the most pro-abortion state in the nation.” While the Illinois Family Institute is encouraging Illinoisans to contact their lawmakers to protect the Parental Notice of Abortion (3), Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Illinois are encouraging their followers to contact their lawmakers to repeal the law. (4)
Under the Parental Notice of Abortion Act, a doctor providing care to a young person under age 18 seeking an abortion in Illinois must notify a designated adult family member – a parent, grandparent, step-parent living in the home, or legal guardian – at least 48 hours in advance of the procedure. If there is a reason that the young person is not able to have one of these family members notified, the young person can go to court and ask a judge for permission to have the procedure without this family involvement in a process known as “judicial bypass.”
Human Rights Watch declares “this law may force young people to continue pregnancies against their will or to endure abuse, humiliation, and punishment by unsupportive parents. And their alternative as they try to make decisions about their own bodies and lives may be to face a difficult and even traumatizing court experience.” (5)
The ACLU of Illinois operates a Judicial Bypass Coordination Project to provide free legal assistance to youth impacted by the law. More than 500 young people in the past seven years have been represented through this venue since the law went into effect in judicial bypass proceedings around the state. Of this number, only one young person’s request for a bypass was ultimately denied. The ACLU states, “After years of representing young people before judges in bypass cases around the state of Illinois, it is clear that this law is unnecessary and harmful.” They underscore their position by arguing that working with a lawyer and surreptitiously arranging for a court appearance adds a week on average (and sometimes much more) to a young person’s timeline of obtaining abortion care. Those days can be critical – a young person may pass the point of eligibility for a noninvasive medication abortion or may need a procedure requiring multiple appointments over consecutive days. Earlier this year, Illinois State Senator Elgie R. Sims, Jr. and State Representative Anna Moeller introduced measures in both Illinois General Assembly chambers aimed at repealing this law – SB 2190 and HB 1797, respectively. (6) The bills were not passed but these two organizations vow to continue to work on this legislation.
The State Journal Register reports that, "Hundreds attended a rally at the Old State Capitol Saturday (October 2) organized by Planned Parenthood of Illinois, and calling for the repeal of abortion-related laws in Texas and Illinois. The Texas law, which allows citizens to sue anyone aiding in an abortion, is being challenged by the U.S. Department of Justice and considered by the rally's organizers as setting a precedent that is an affront to access to abortions everywhere. Illinois is one of 38 states to require parental notice without a court order.” The article goes on to report: “There were more than 600 rallies nationwide calling for less restrictions and free access to abortions in the country in the aftermath of the Texas law, which went into effect Sept. 1. Arguments were made in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Texas on Friday to block the law. Rally organizers, workers and speakers included ACLU Springfield, Action Illinois, Black Lives Matter SPI, Coalition of Rainbow Alliances (CORAL) Springfield, Planned Parenthood Illinois Action, Resistor Sisterhood, The Sangamon Valley Group of the Sierra Club and Springfield Call 2 ACTion, League of Women Voters of Illinois, Abraham Lincoln Unitarian Universalist Church, and the Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence.” (7) The Pantagraph, which is a Bloomington newpaper, reporting on the rallies said, “Thousands in Illinois rally for abortion rights, oppose Texas curbs.” (8)
On September 2, Illinois Gov. Pritzker said that he’s “very concerned” about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision not to block the new Texas law banning most abortions in the state, and vowed Illinois would continue to welcome women from elsewhere who need reproductive health care making “Illinois a beacon of hope for women who need reproductive health.” (9)
In recent years, Illinois has expanded abortion rights in anticipation of Supreme Court challenges. In 2019, Pritzker signed sweeping legislation that established women’s access to the procedure as a “fundamental right” and required insurance coverage for abortion, contraception and related medical care. The law voided decades-old abortion regulations that were on the books but hadn’t taken effect because of court orders, including restrictions on late-term abortions and criminal penalties for doctors who performed them. Activists and Democratic leaders called the protection of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision a critical matter because of the conservative shift on the Supreme Court and because prohibitions in other states could lead to overturning of that decision which legalized abortion nationwide.
The number of out-of-state residents who have sought abortions in Illinois has increased each year since 2014, which then amounted to 2,970 out of a total 38,472 abortions in the state, according to the Illinois Department of public Health. In 2019, the latest data available, there were roughly 7,500 women crossing state lines, making up about 16% of the roughly 46,500 abortions in Illinois that year. (10)
Illinois Right to Life Action notes that minor girls cannot get their ears pierced or go on a field trip without their parents’ consent. Basic common sense might seem to suggest that parents should be notified before their child undergoes something as life-changing and life-ending as an abortion. Most Illinoisans agree with that opinion. A Tarrance Poll taken last March found that a 72% of Illinois voters support keeping Parental Notification of Abortion in place. This includes 55% of voters who identified as “pro-choice”. (11)
On October 2, pro-abortion followers demonstrated for a repeal of the Parental Notification Law. The following day, October 3, the Catholic Church celebrated Respect Life Month. Abortion is possibly the most divisive topic in America today. The repeal of the Parental Notification Act could likely be brought to a vote during the Illinois General Assembly Fall Veto Session, which is October 19-21 and 26-28.
As people who believe in the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death, let us make our voices heard – to God through prayer and fasting and to our government leaders by contacting them. The following links for the Illinois Family Institute
https://www.votervoice.net/ILFI/campaigns/70222/respond
and Illinois Right to Life Action https://illinoisrighttolifeaction.org/2021/03/12/action-alert-anti-life-bills-threaten-parental-rights/
provide a means to do that.
End Notes:
1 https://www.catholicaction.org/respect_life_month#:~:text=April%2017%2C%202019%20Since%201972%20various%20%E2%80%9CRespect%20Life%E2%80%9D,has%20traditionally%20been%20observed%20as%20Respect%20Life%20Month
2 https://www.respectlife.org/respect-life-month
3 IFI E-Alert takeaction@illinoisfamily.org via votervoice.net
4 https://www.aclu-il.org/en/news/illinois-repeal-forced-parental-notice-abortion
5 https://www.aclu-il.org/en/news/illinois-repeal-forced-parental-notice-abortion
6 https://www.aclu-il.org/en/news/illinois-repeal-forced-parental-notice-abortion
7 https://www.sj-r.com/story/news/2021/10/02/planned-parenthood-abortion-law-protest-springfield/5948510001/
9 https://apnews.com/article/abortion-health-us-supreme-court-illinois-f1a03ad9c1ba5dbce1293796aa72dcf8
10 https://apnews.com/article/abortion-health-us-supreme-court-illinois-f1a03ad9c1ba5dbce1293796aa72dcf8
11 https://illinoisrighttolifeaction.org/2021/03/12/action-alert-anti-life-bills-threaten-parental-rights/
Alternatives to Government Schools
By Joyce Geiler
In July of this year, the Illinois Review published an article titled “ILLINOIS SCHOOL CURRICULUM GETS AN "F" IN CIVICS, HISTORY STANDARDS (1), which states that Illinois' civics and history curriculum standards are inadequate according to the Fordham Institute report. The report can be accessed at link (2) in the endnotes. The report says Illinois is one of twenty states that failed to pass an acceptable level. The report states, “Illinois’ civics standards are a faint shadow of what state civics standards could and should be. Illinois’ U.S. History standards are almost nonexistent, providing insufficient guidance for educators who have the responsibility to teach American history.” The section of the report specific to Illinois begins on page 122 and is eye-opening concerning today’s general lack of knowledge of our history.
While this week’s article could focus on a connection between that which is noted in the Fordham Institute report and Illinois current woke culture, cancel culture, humanism and liberalism, the article will instead focus on another comment from the Illinois Review article. “On the other hand, homeschooling parents need not worry about keeping up with the public schools in these two areas. Teaching anything about civics and U.S. History surpasses the state's standards.” (3)
Homeschooling is an alternative to sending Illinois’ children to government schools, but it is not practical for all families. Are there other alternatives? Yes. First, though, parents must be convinced that government schools are detrimental enough to their children’s wellbeing so that they will seriously seek workable alternatives.
Laurie Higgins of Illinois Family Institute published an April, 2021 article, “A Plea to Exit Public Schools ASAP.” (3) It was also released as a podcast for those who prefer that format. (4) Illinois Family Institute has a generous collection of resources to assist parents to do just that – exit public schools. (5) Also, Public School Exit (6) is a national resource. Their booklet “Public School Exit, Rescuing Our Children,” is a how-to manual that can be read online. (7) The following paragraphs summarize some options outlined in the booklet. Note that all models involve a partnership of parents and church.
Homeschool Church-Parent Co-op
Parents homeschool their children and the church opens its location once or twice a week for some of the classes. The classroom environment may be helpful for some subjects. Children can socialize and learn communication skills. The classes can be led by volunteers or paid educators.
One-Room School Method
A teacher working with multiple grade levels in one classroom enables students to review concepts and also learn concepts above their own grade level. It encourages peer tutoring and a family atmosphere. The teacher would be paid by the parents and the church location would be utilized three to five days a week. This is a way for a small group to begin and to grow.
Umbrella School
Church Membership Association Co-op
The church does the administrative portion, including SAT testing, keeping records and such while parents choose their curriculum and do the daily education.
University Model
Operating out of a local church venue, The Independent Learning Academy, which has been in operation since 2012, (8) pays the church for the use of their venue in a business relationship. The University Model from University-Model Schools International (UMSI) (9) is used for grades K-12. The model began in 1993 pursuing a philosophy and system of education in which the homeschooling family can customize their educational needs and experiences. Classes are scheduled at the church where the students meet with the teacher.
Concerned and creative parents throughout Illinois are finding ways to responsibly steward their children’s education. Linda Johnson reports on one such way found in Freeport. When SB818, the Comprehensive Sex Education bill, became law in Illinois, a group of Freeport citizens became urgently awakened to the necessity of a Christian high school. Freeport has some Christian elementary schools and a Catholic high school so people are looking for alternatives to the current high schools that are located in Freeport. The concerned citizens began by considering what resources already existed and what they would need to start a Christian high school.
The Freeport consortium determined that it made sense to utilize the Halstrom Home School Workshops model. The Halstrom co-op serves Rockford and greater northern Illinois and southern Wisconsin area, including Janesville, Rochelle, Freeport, Harvard and areas between. (10) Students attend class at a church or other venue once a week and complete required work at home under parental supervision before returning to class the following week. Traditional classes as well as specialized activities are included. This group of Freeport citizen approached the church where the elementary Tri-County Christian School meet in the past and found the church was willing to provide a venue for a high school. Then, they began the search for teachers, which has been successful. With some details yet to be worked out, the new Christian high school hopes to be ready to welcome students for this school year’s second semester. First some parents recognized a legitimate and urgent need, then they researched resources and finally began securing additionally needed resources. This is just one example of a community finding a way to exit the public school system and make Christian-based education happen.
Homeschooling may be more possible than some parents think. People can perish for lack of knowledge but knowledge is available. Details regarding Illinois homeschool requirements can be found at Time4Learning. (11) Homeschool groups provide support as well as activities throughout Illinois. Homeschool World lists 63 such organizations in Illinois. (12)
In this series of articles, it has been established that parents have a God-ordained responsibility and right to direct their children’s education and that relinquishing that control to Illinois’ public/government education system is detrimental to our children, to our society and certainly to the kingdom of God. Pointing out a problem without offering solutions is not helpful, so today’s article gives information about solutions. This school year begins very soon. We bless parents with grace and wisdom in their parental role.
Endnotes:
https://www.illinoisreview.com/illinoisreview/2021/07/illinois-schools-get-f-.html
https://fordhaminstitute.org/sites/default/files/publication/pdfs/20210623-state-state-standards-civics-and-us-history-20210.pdf#page=122
https://illinoisfamily.org/education/a-plea-to-exit-public-schools-asap/
https://illinoisfamily.org/podcast/podcast-a-plea-to-exit-public-schools-asap/
https://illinoisfamily.org/
https://www.publicschoolexit.com/
https://www.publicschoolexit.com/parent-church-brochure
https://www.independentlearningacademy.org/program-works/
https://umsi.org/about-umsi/
https://iche.org/groups/hallstrom-home-school-workshops
https://www.time4learning.com/homeschooling/illinois/laws-requirements.html?msclkid=055c523dfb411d8d93e2332c358b0ac6&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=TI%20-%20DSA%20May%202020&utm_term=homeschool%20&utm_content=Home%20School%20Category
https://www.home-school.com/groups/IL.php#:~:text=Arlington%20HOUSE%20%28a%20chapter%20of%20Illinois%20HOUSE%29%2C%20is,members%20to%20help%20coordinate%20field%20trips%20and%20activities
By Joyce Geiler
In July of this year, the Illinois Review published an article titled “ILLINOIS SCHOOL CURRICULUM GETS AN "F" IN CIVICS, HISTORY STANDARDS (1), which states that Illinois' civics and history curriculum standards are inadequate according to the Fordham Institute report. The report can be accessed at link (2) in the endnotes. The report says Illinois is one of twenty states that failed to pass an acceptable level. The report states, “Illinois’ civics standards are a faint shadow of what state civics standards could and should be. Illinois’ U.S. History standards are almost nonexistent, providing insufficient guidance for educators who have the responsibility to teach American history.” The section of the report specific to Illinois begins on page 122 and is eye-opening concerning today’s general lack of knowledge of our history.
While this week’s article could focus on a connection between that which is noted in the Fordham Institute report and Illinois current woke culture, cancel culture, humanism and liberalism, the article will instead focus on another comment from the Illinois Review article. “On the other hand, homeschooling parents need not worry about keeping up with the public schools in these two areas. Teaching anything about civics and U.S. History surpasses the state's standards.” (3)
Homeschooling is an alternative to sending Illinois’ children to government schools, but it is not practical for all families. Are there other alternatives? Yes. First, though, parents must be convinced that government schools are detrimental enough to their children’s wellbeing so that they will seriously seek workable alternatives.
Laurie Higgins of Illinois Family Institute published an April, 2021 article, “A Plea to Exit Public Schools ASAP.” (3) It was also released as a podcast for those who prefer that format. (4) Illinois Family Institute has a generous collection of resources to assist parents to do just that – exit public schools. (5) Also, Public School Exit (6) is a national resource. Their booklet “Public School Exit, Rescuing Our Children,” is a how-to manual that can be read online. (7) The following paragraphs summarize some options outlined in the booklet. Note that all models involve a partnership of parents and church.
Homeschool Church-Parent Co-op
Parents homeschool their children and the church opens its location once or twice a week for some of the classes. The classroom environment may be helpful for some subjects. Children can socialize and learn communication skills. The classes can be led by volunteers or paid educators.
One-Room School Method
A teacher working with multiple grade levels in one classroom enables students to review concepts and also learn concepts above their own grade level. It encourages peer tutoring and a family atmosphere. The teacher would be paid by the parents and the church location would be utilized three to five days a week. This is a way for a small group to begin and to grow.
Umbrella School
Church Membership Association Co-op
The church does the administrative portion, including SAT testing, keeping records and such while parents choose their curriculum and do the daily education.
University Model
Operating out of a local church venue, The Independent Learning Academy, which has been in operation since 2012, (8) pays the church for the use of their venue in a business relationship. The University Model from University-Model Schools International (UMSI) (9) is used for grades K-12. The model began in 1993 pursuing a philosophy and system of education in which the homeschooling family can customize their educational needs and experiences. Classes are scheduled at the church where the students meet with the teacher.
Concerned and creative parents throughout Illinois are finding ways to responsibly steward their children’s education. Linda Johnson reports on one such way found in Freeport. When SB818, the Comprehensive Sex Education bill, became law in Illinois, a group of Freeport citizens became urgently awakened to the necessity of a Christian high school. Freeport has some Christian elementary schools and a Catholic high school so people are looking for alternatives to the current high schools that are located in Freeport. The concerned citizens began by considering what resources already existed and what they would need to start a Christian high school.
The Freeport consortium determined that it made sense to utilize the Halstrom Home School Workshops model. The Halstrom co-op serves Rockford and greater northern Illinois and southern Wisconsin area, including Janesville, Rochelle, Freeport, Harvard and areas between. (10) Students attend class at a church or other venue once a week and complete required work at home under parental supervision before returning to class the following week. Traditional classes as well as specialized activities are included. This group of Freeport citizen approached the church where the elementary Tri-County Christian School meet in the past and found the church was willing to provide a venue for a high school. Then, they began the search for teachers, which has been successful. With some details yet to be worked out, the new Christian high school hopes to be ready to welcome students for this school year’s second semester. First some parents recognized a legitimate and urgent need, then they researched resources and finally began securing additionally needed resources. This is just one example of a community finding a way to exit the public school system and make Christian-based education happen.
Homeschooling may be more possible than some parents think. People can perish for lack of knowledge but knowledge is available. Details regarding Illinois homeschool requirements can be found at Time4Learning. (11) Homeschool groups provide support as well as activities throughout Illinois. Homeschool World lists 63 such organizations in Illinois. (12)
In this series of articles, it has been established that parents have a God-ordained responsibility and right to direct their children’s education and that relinquishing that control to Illinois’ public/government education system is detrimental to our children, to our society and certainly to the kingdom of God. Pointing out a problem without offering solutions is not helpful, so today’s article gives information about solutions. This school year begins very soon. We bless parents with grace and wisdom in their parental role.
Endnotes:
https://www.illinoisreview.com/illinoisreview/2021/07/illinois-schools-get-f-.html
https://fordhaminstitute.org/sites/default/files/publication/pdfs/20210623-state-state-standards-civics-and-us-history-20210.pdf#page=122
https://illinoisfamily.org/education/a-plea-to-exit-public-schools-asap/
https://illinoisfamily.org/podcast/podcast-a-plea-to-exit-public-schools-asap/
https://illinoisfamily.org/
https://www.publicschoolexit.com/
https://www.publicschoolexit.com/parent-church-brochure
https://www.independentlearningacademy.org/program-works/
https://umsi.org/about-umsi/
https://iche.org/groups/hallstrom-home-school-workshops
https://www.time4learning.com/homeschooling/illinois/laws-requirements.html?msclkid=055c523dfb411d8d93e2332c358b0ac6&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=TI%20-%20DSA%20May%202020&utm_term=homeschool%20&utm_content=Home%20School%20Category
https://www.home-school.com/groups/IL.php#:~:text=Arlington%20HOUSE%20%28a%20chapter%20of%20Illinois%20HOUSE%29%2C%20is,members%20to%20help%20coordinate%20field%20trips%20and%20activities
Education: How Did We Get Here?
By Joyce Geiler
Critical Race Theory. Comprehensive Sex Education. Project 1619. Contraceptives and abortions without parental knowledge. Shared bathrooms and showers. Mediocre educational performance. How did America go from being the best-educated society in all of human history – a moral and intellectual superpower – to being a dumbed down, ignorant and increasingly immoral nation on the brink of destruction?
It certainly didn’t happen overnight or even within the last 50 years. When one grasps the enormity of the ever-increasing snowball of government control of public education, it can be overwhelming and hopeless. Keep in mind while reading this article, that it will end with the declaration, “but God.” While I could write much more than this article has space to contain, I will, with permission from the magazine, utilize research provided in the 2020 edition of The New American magazine article entitled “From Education Excellence to Mediocrity” by Alex Newman. In recent meetings, Illinois Family Institute distributed copies of this special edition of The New American magazine. (Material from other sources will be duly noted.)
Public schools as they exist today did not exist in America from the time of the first settlers to the mid-1800s. Rather than hand children to the government to be educated, almost all education was handled by families, religious institutions, tutors, private schools and the free market. In Philadelphia, for example, Quaker schools often allowed poor Quaker and non-Quaker children to attend without paying fees. The Scottish Presbyterians, the Moravians, the Lutherans and Anglicans all had their own schools plus private schoolmasters established hundreds of schools. Over 125 private schoolmasters advertised their services in Philadelphia newspapers between 1740 and 1776 offering instruction in Latin, Greek, mathematics, surveying, navigation, accounting, bookkeeping, science, English and contemporary foreign languages. At home, children were taught by parents and older siblings. Literacy was widespread. The “Federalist Papers” published in the late 1870s explaining the newly drafted U.S. Constitution were aimed at the common American farmer, merchant and laborer who could read and comprehend.
The first giant step away from traditional, classical, Christian education toward socialistic and humanistic education began in 1837 in Massachusetts under Horace Man who was appointed the first Education Secretary of Massachusetts where he served in the legislature. Mann, a unitarian who rejected the Bible as God’s Word, introduced the Prussian system of education, the first systemic effort by Western government to seize total control over education. Teachers were trained by the state, and statism and unquestioning obedience to government was instilled in children by teachers who were trained by the state. The goal was to equalize the conditions of men under the premise that everyone would be more equal if everyone received the same education. By the mid-1800s compulsory attendance laws and government schools were becoming common in the northern United States and by 1900, dozens of states had imposed the Prussian-style system. This writer notes that in reading a history of Horce Mann one can easily be convinced that his approach was a wonderful improvement as he was adept at countering concerns expressed by those who objected to his secular approach.
After Mann came John Dewey, who was the next major reformer and who, along with Mann, is regarded as the founding father of the American public education system. Dewey was transparent in his zeal for reforming mankind to fit his atheistic, collectivist vision. Mann went to Prussia for his educational inspiration and Dewey visited Lenin’s Soviet Russia returning ideas. He wrote in 1935, “organized social planning is the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professional aims.” Dewey quoted Edward Bellamy who envisioned a communist America without private property by the year 2000. Dewey signed and played a key role in developing the Humanist Manifesto, which is essentially a complete rejection of freedom and the Creator and, therefore, a rejection of the inalienable rights of individuals from their Creator as expressed in the Declaration of Independence.
Dewey viewed education as the key to bringing about societal changes. Dewey recognized however, that to force it too quickly would compromise its final success by inciting a violent reaction. One avenue he used to hijack the educational system was to take over the most important teaching colleges, especially the University of Chicago and Teachers College at Columbia University so that future educators could be trained as he desired.
The Rockefeller Foundation funded Dewey’s and other’s similar endeavors. Another aspect of Dewey’s “reformation” was to institute the “whole word” method of reading, a method used for teaching deaf children to read since they could not hear to sound out words phonetically. “Sight words” are still mandated as part of Common Core standards and although there was a great cry against Common Core, 35 states including Illinois plus Washington D.C., still use Common Core standards as of 2021.
(More information on Common Core available here.)
Two-thirds of high-school seniors are not proficient in reading according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Common Core standards align with Dewey’s premises.
In 1962, the Supreme Court banned school-sponsored prayer in public schools, although students could be allowed to meet and pray on school grounds as long as they do so privately and don't try to force others to do the same. In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled that prayers and religious practices in government schools were unconstitutional. Note that the First Amendment clearly states that Congress, not the Court, shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion. In 1965, Congress passed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act which provides federal funding to primary and secondary education. Over the years, increasing regulations have been passed on how schools may use the funds, thus enabling federal control over schools. In order to receive the funds, schools must comply with federal mandates. The establishment of the U. S. Department of Education in 1979 enabled the federal government to have more control over government schools. (End of material from The New American)
American government as well as state governments, including Illinois, have cooperated with and promoted a globalization of education by signing on to the United Nations Agenda 21. American government as well as Illinois state government have bowed to please every voice shouting loudly for its supremacy to overthrow personal responsibility and morality as expressed in Christianity. The foundation for the success of these efforts was laid nearly 200 years ago by people who understood long term thinking. God also understands long term planning as evidenced by His promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to make of their descendants a great nation. Our Founding Fathers understood that the fledgling United States of America would succeed only by cooperating with God’s long-term strategies. The conflict of thrones has become very evident in our time. Who will control/ rule the generations and the future of America: those who sit on the thrones of the world or those who are seated with Christ Jesus in heavenly places, not only legislating from that heavenly position and perspective but also actively reclaiming the responsibility of educating their children in righteousness?
By Joyce Geiler
Critical Race Theory. Comprehensive Sex Education. Project 1619. Contraceptives and abortions without parental knowledge. Shared bathrooms and showers. Mediocre educational performance. How did America go from being the best-educated society in all of human history – a moral and intellectual superpower – to being a dumbed down, ignorant and increasingly immoral nation on the brink of destruction?
It certainly didn’t happen overnight or even within the last 50 years. When one grasps the enormity of the ever-increasing snowball of government control of public education, it can be overwhelming and hopeless. Keep in mind while reading this article, that it will end with the declaration, “but God.” While I could write much more than this article has space to contain, I will, with permission from the magazine, utilize research provided in the 2020 edition of The New American magazine article entitled “From Education Excellence to Mediocrity” by Alex Newman. In recent meetings, Illinois Family Institute distributed copies of this special edition of The New American magazine. (Material from other sources will be duly noted.)
Public schools as they exist today did not exist in America from the time of the first settlers to the mid-1800s. Rather than hand children to the government to be educated, almost all education was handled by families, religious institutions, tutors, private schools and the free market. In Philadelphia, for example, Quaker schools often allowed poor Quaker and non-Quaker children to attend without paying fees. The Scottish Presbyterians, the Moravians, the Lutherans and Anglicans all had their own schools plus private schoolmasters established hundreds of schools. Over 125 private schoolmasters advertised their services in Philadelphia newspapers between 1740 and 1776 offering instruction in Latin, Greek, mathematics, surveying, navigation, accounting, bookkeeping, science, English and contemporary foreign languages. At home, children were taught by parents and older siblings. Literacy was widespread. The “Federalist Papers” published in the late 1870s explaining the newly drafted U.S. Constitution were aimed at the common American farmer, merchant and laborer who could read and comprehend.
The first giant step away from traditional, classical, Christian education toward socialistic and humanistic education began in 1837 in Massachusetts under Horace Man who was appointed the first Education Secretary of Massachusetts where he served in the legislature. Mann, a unitarian who rejected the Bible as God’s Word, introduced the Prussian system of education, the first systemic effort by Western government to seize total control over education. Teachers were trained by the state, and statism and unquestioning obedience to government was instilled in children by teachers who were trained by the state. The goal was to equalize the conditions of men under the premise that everyone would be more equal if everyone received the same education. By the mid-1800s compulsory attendance laws and government schools were becoming common in the northern United States and by 1900, dozens of states had imposed the Prussian-style system. This writer notes that in reading a history of Horce Mann one can easily be convinced that his approach was a wonderful improvement as he was adept at countering concerns expressed by those who objected to his secular approach.
After Mann came John Dewey, who was the next major reformer and who, along with Mann, is regarded as the founding father of the American public education system. Dewey was transparent in his zeal for reforming mankind to fit his atheistic, collectivist vision. Mann went to Prussia for his educational inspiration and Dewey visited Lenin’s Soviet Russia returning ideas. He wrote in 1935, “organized social planning is the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professional aims.” Dewey quoted Edward Bellamy who envisioned a communist America without private property by the year 2000. Dewey signed and played a key role in developing the Humanist Manifesto, which is essentially a complete rejection of freedom and the Creator and, therefore, a rejection of the inalienable rights of individuals from their Creator as expressed in the Declaration of Independence.
Dewey viewed education as the key to bringing about societal changes. Dewey recognized however, that to force it too quickly would compromise its final success by inciting a violent reaction. One avenue he used to hijack the educational system was to take over the most important teaching colleges, especially the University of Chicago and Teachers College at Columbia University so that future educators could be trained as he desired.
The Rockefeller Foundation funded Dewey’s and other’s similar endeavors. Another aspect of Dewey’s “reformation” was to institute the “whole word” method of reading, a method used for teaching deaf children to read since they could not hear to sound out words phonetically. “Sight words” are still mandated as part of Common Core standards and although there was a great cry against Common Core, 35 states including Illinois plus Washington D.C., still use Common Core standards as of 2021.
(More information on Common Core available here.)
Two-thirds of high-school seniors are not proficient in reading according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Common Core standards align with Dewey’s premises.
In 1962, the Supreme Court banned school-sponsored prayer in public schools, although students could be allowed to meet and pray on school grounds as long as they do so privately and don't try to force others to do the same. In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled that prayers and religious practices in government schools were unconstitutional. Note that the First Amendment clearly states that Congress, not the Court, shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion. In 1965, Congress passed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act which provides federal funding to primary and secondary education. Over the years, increasing regulations have been passed on how schools may use the funds, thus enabling federal control over schools. In order to receive the funds, schools must comply with federal mandates. The establishment of the U. S. Department of Education in 1979 enabled the federal government to have more control over government schools. (End of material from The New American)
American government as well as state governments, including Illinois, have cooperated with and promoted a globalization of education by signing on to the United Nations Agenda 21. American government as well as Illinois state government have bowed to please every voice shouting loudly for its supremacy to overthrow personal responsibility and morality as expressed in Christianity. The foundation for the success of these efforts was laid nearly 200 years ago by people who understood long term thinking. God also understands long term planning as evidenced by His promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to make of their descendants a great nation. Our Founding Fathers understood that the fledgling United States of America would succeed only by cooperating with God’s long-term strategies. The conflict of thrones has become very evident in our time. Who will control/ rule the generations and the future of America: those who sit on the thrones of the world or those who are seated with Christ Jesus in heavenly places, not only legislating from that heavenly position and perspective but also actively reclaiming the responsibility of educating their children in righteousness?
What Do the Scriptures Say About Our Children’s Education?
By Joyce Geiler
Stan and Delbra Pratt, Pastors of Way of Life Church in Taylorville, hosted the bimonthly gathering of the Coalition of Apostolic Alliances on July 12. Over 50 participants sought scriptural understanding regarding the role and responsibilities of the education of Illinois youth so they could agree as an Ekklesia on biblically affirmed declarations regarding the education of the children of Illinois. Those who gathered agreed that the children of Illinois must be rescued from the grievous legislation that has been passed by Illinois legislators, including Critical Race Theory and the destructive SB 818 (Comprehensive Sex Education) that is poised for Governor Pritzker’s signature.
At the CAA gathering, Illinois Family Institute provided information regarding alternatives to public education. Paul Hurst from Illinois Family Action and Illinois Senator Darren Bailey both encouraged parental involvement in Illinois’ educational system. The main information shared, however, was researched from the Scriptures. What does God say about the education of children? While there are many instructive scriptures, perhaps the most definitive passage is Deuteronomy 6 in which the responsibility for a child’s education is clearly defined.
“Hear, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord is one [the only God]! You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and mind and with all your soul and with all your strength [your entire being]. These words, which I am commanding you today, shall be [written] on your heart and mind. You shall teach them diligently to your children [impressing God’s precepts on their minds and penetrating their hearts with His truths] and shall speak of them when you sit in your house and when you walk on the road and when you lie down and when you get up. And you shall bind them as a sign on your hand (forearm), and they shall be used as bands (frontals, frontlets) on your forehead. You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.” (Deuteronomy 6:4-9 AMP)
Without question parents have the biblical right and responsibility for ensuring their child is educated not only in God’s word but also the application of that word to all aspects of life.
Participants reviewed the concept of jurisdictions or spheres of responsibility established by God. Self-government, the authority of the family, the jurisdiction of the church and civil jurisdictions are the four scriptural spheres of responsibility or jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction has responsibilities or duties and each has limitations. One jurisdiction is not to invade the boundary of another. Self-government is taught by the family. The family is to teach and model through nurturing love and support, through coaching and apprenticeship, and by applying age-appropriate precepts that lead to maturity. When parents apply these methods, the child matures and can be released into their identity, purpose, and destiny; and the grown child can exercise self-governance and in the dual citizenship: citizens of earth and citizens of heaven. During this maturation process, the family protects the spirit, soul and body of the child and provides for them spiritually, emotionally, mentally and physically. The family can choose to delegate some of these responsibilities but cannot abdicate them nor allow them to be taken from their sphere of authority.
The God-appointed role of the church is to restore man to that which God originally entrusted to Adam and again made accessible to man by the redemptive work of Christ through preaching, teaching and discipleship. (Dr. Patti Amsden; East Gate Reformation Training Institute; Kingdom Pillars of Cultural Reformation; Course #6 The Cultural Pillar of Education.) In that role, the church rightly teaches parents their biblical responsibility regarding their children. The church can also offer private or church-sponsored educational opportunities to which parents may choose to avail their families. Churches can also practice charity by offering aid or funding to children and families who are not able to participate in parent-paid or family-supported acceptable educational opportunities.
The civil jurisdiction protects and defends its citizens. (Romans 13:4,5) “It is to establish laws that reflect God’s eternal principles for administering societal justice. It is to keep the peace by intervening with punitive power to restore jurisdictional sovereignty when one realm breaches the legally-defined boundaries of another. The civil realm has no biblical mandate to build, maintain, fund or operate state schools nor to attempt to force equality in educational opportunity through legislative action, judicial sanctions or fiscal inducement.” (Ibid. Dr. Patti Amsden) In other words, the government has no role in education at all except to educate those who are to function in the civil realm services.
Participants realized that families have allowed the government to take over the education of our children to such an extent that many feel there is no alternative, even when the civil is now mandating comprehensive sex education and the teaching of Critical Race Theory. Some participants believe the answer is to revamp and improve the public/government school system. Searching the scriptures, however, reveals that government has no right or role in the education of our children and that the primary responsibility for all aspects of the care of children falls into the jurisdiction of the family. Exactly how to change the approach to education and what it will look like can only be accomplished incrementally. Resources were given for those who can more immediately take charge of their children’s education. Participants agreed that, in general, the necessary direction is toward restoration of the role of the family in education and the prayers and declarations made at the gathering reflected that conviction. Many powerful decrees were made regarding bringing heaven’s order into the earth of Illinois. A good example of those declarations can be found in the Prayer Points.
By Joyce Geiler
Stan and Delbra Pratt, Pastors of Way of Life Church in Taylorville, hosted the bimonthly gathering of the Coalition of Apostolic Alliances on July 12. Over 50 participants sought scriptural understanding regarding the role and responsibilities of the education of Illinois youth so they could agree as an Ekklesia on biblically affirmed declarations regarding the education of the children of Illinois. Those who gathered agreed that the children of Illinois must be rescued from the grievous legislation that has been passed by Illinois legislators, including Critical Race Theory and the destructive SB 818 (Comprehensive Sex Education) that is poised for Governor Pritzker’s signature.
At the CAA gathering, Illinois Family Institute provided information regarding alternatives to public education. Paul Hurst from Illinois Family Action and Illinois Senator Darren Bailey both encouraged parental involvement in Illinois’ educational system. The main information shared, however, was researched from the Scriptures. What does God say about the education of children? While there are many instructive scriptures, perhaps the most definitive passage is Deuteronomy 6 in which the responsibility for a child’s education is clearly defined.
“Hear, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord is one [the only God]! You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and mind and with all your soul and with all your strength [your entire being]. These words, which I am commanding you today, shall be [written] on your heart and mind. You shall teach them diligently to your children [impressing God’s precepts on their minds and penetrating their hearts with His truths] and shall speak of them when you sit in your house and when you walk on the road and when you lie down and when you get up. And you shall bind them as a sign on your hand (forearm), and they shall be used as bands (frontals, frontlets) on your forehead. You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.” (Deuteronomy 6:4-9 AMP)
Without question parents have the biblical right and responsibility for ensuring their child is educated not only in God’s word but also the application of that word to all aspects of life.
Participants reviewed the concept of jurisdictions or spheres of responsibility established by God. Self-government, the authority of the family, the jurisdiction of the church and civil jurisdictions are the four scriptural spheres of responsibility or jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction has responsibilities or duties and each has limitations. One jurisdiction is not to invade the boundary of another. Self-government is taught by the family. The family is to teach and model through nurturing love and support, through coaching and apprenticeship, and by applying age-appropriate precepts that lead to maturity. When parents apply these methods, the child matures and can be released into their identity, purpose, and destiny; and the grown child can exercise self-governance and in the dual citizenship: citizens of earth and citizens of heaven. During this maturation process, the family protects the spirit, soul and body of the child and provides for them spiritually, emotionally, mentally and physically. The family can choose to delegate some of these responsibilities but cannot abdicate them nor allow them to be taken from their sphere of authority.
The God-appointed role of the church is to restore man to that which God originally entrusted to Adam and again made accessible to man by the redemptive work of Christ through preaching, teaching and discipleship. (Dr. Patti Amsden; East Gate Reformation Training Institute; Kingdom Pillars of Cultural Reformation; Course #6 The Cultural Pillar of Education.) In that role, the church rightly teaches parents their biblical responsibility regarding their children. The church can also offer private or church-sponsored educational opportunities to which parents may choose to avail their families. Churches can also practice charity by offering aid or funding to children and families who are not able to participate in parent-paid or family-supported acceptable educational opportunities.
The civil jurisdiction protects and defends its citizens. (Romans 13:4,5) “It is to establish laws that reflect God’s eternal principles for administering societal justice. It is to keep the peace by intervening with punitive power to restore jurisdictional sovereignty when one realm breaches the legally-defined boundaries of another. The civil realm has no biblical mandate to build, maintain, fund or operate state schools nor to attempt to force equality in educational opportunity through legislative action, judicial sanctions or fiscal inducement.” (Ibid. Dr. Patti Amsden) In other words, the government has no role in education at all except to educate those who are to function in the civil realm services.
Participants realized that families have allowed the government to take over the education of our children to such an extent that many feel there is no alternative, even when the civil is now mandating comprehensive sex education and the teaching of Critical Race Theory. Some participants believe the answer is to revamp and improve the public/government school system. Searching the scriptures, however, reveals that government has no right or role in the education of our children and that the primary responsibility for all aspects of the care of children falls into the jurisdiction of the family. Exactly how to change the approach to education and what it will look like can only be accomplished incrementally. Resources were given for those who can more immediately take charge of their children’s education. Participants agreed that, in general, the necessary direction is toward restoration of the role of the family in education and the prayers and declarations made at the gathering reflected that conviction. Many powerful decrees were made regarding bringing heaven’s order into the earth of Illinois. A good example of those declarations can be found in the Prayer Points.
Sex Education in Illinois’ Public (Government) Schools
By Joyce Geiler
Many Christians are familiar with Romans 8:28 “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.” Without taking this verse out of the context in which the Apostle Paul is encouraging believers to persevere knowing that God is working a higher purpose in their lives, consider applying this scripture to the Covid pandemic. Is God really able to work that for our good? There is most certainly one area in which He already is - the sphere of education of our children. As frustrating as schooling has been for parents and students during the shutdown of schools, the biggest take-away for many parents has been the exposure to the education their children are or are not getting in Illinois’ government-run public schools. Eyes have been opened and parents are searching for alternatives. This article will begin to explore weaknesses and contra-biblical aspects of Illinois’ public school system. This is not intended to be an attack on teachers, but a discussion of the system that has overtaken the parental role in education in a most detrimental way.
Although this article begins by presenting data regarding the inadequate job Illinois’ public schools are doing in the area of education, the second part of the article will address the larger issue, the more egregious issue, of what is happening regarding sex-education in our schools.
IllinoisReportCard.com is the state’s official source for information about public schools across Illinois. (1) Illinoisreportcard.com reports that only 32% of students met or exceeded grade level proficiency standards in math for the 2019 school year after completing the Scholarship Aptitude Test (SAT). Only 38% of students met or exceeded grade level proficiency in English Language Arts. The Illinois Science Assessment test shows 49% of students are at grade proficiency in science. Illinois Report Card states: “These skills are necessary in order for students to be successful in the real world.”
From 2006 to 2016 the overall average SAT scores fell a total of 34 points, falling in each of the three sections tested. There was a sharp increase in scores in 2017 partly due to the massive redesign of the testing, not an increased proficiency. (2) Overall, Illinois is neither the highest nor the lowest among the states in SAT scores.
Illinois Family Institute notes that rather than focus time and resources on helping students master the basics, “social justice warriors in Springfield, the Illinois State Board of Education, and in government schools are spending increasing amounts of time and resources indoctrinating students with leftist dogma on race, homosexuality, and ‘trans’-cultism.” (3) Our children are truly at risk.
The Illinois Family Institute explains that a small committee approved of the revision of teaching standards, which will require all teachers to become well versed in Critical Race Theory, LGBTQ ideology, and BLM Marxist brainwashing. (4) On May 20, the Illinois Senate passed SB 818, the highly controversial “comprehensive sex education” bill. On May 28, the House likewise passed the bill, which as of this writing awaits the signature of Governor Pritzker to become law. Since he has expressed a plan to "trans" all public schools, he is expected to sign the bill into law. The Illinois Legislature and Governor Pritzker have crossed the boundary lines of parental authority and are claiming authority to direct the education process with sweeping mandates.
SB 818 is named the “Keeping Youth Safe and Healthy Act.” According to the Illinois ACLU, the bill:
“Creates personal health and safety standards for grades K-5 and updates and expands comprehensive sexual health education standards in grades 6-12 to give young people the information and tools they need to be safe and support responsible and informed decision making about their health and well-being throughout their lives. These topics include but are not limited to: anatomy and physiology; healthy relationships; identity; personal safety; pregnancy and reproduction; puberty, growth and adolescent development; and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.”
“It also expands the current requirement that instruction be medically accurate, developmentally and age appropriate to include instruction that is also culturally appropriate, inclusive, and trauma informed. The bill also ensures that comprehensive personal health and safety and sexual health education in Illinois is affirming of identities including those who historically have been stigmatized or excluded including LGBTQIA and pregnant or parenting youth.” (5)
What is it about this legislation that is so offensive and distressing to parents and Bible believing people? In their booklet “Comprehensive Sexuality Education,” the Illinois Family Institute writes that if a school teaches any form of “personal health and safety,” it MUST teach Comprehensive Sex Education (CSE). (6) Note that in 2013, the Illinois General Assembly passed a law mandating that any public school that teaches sex ed must teach comprehensive sex ed (CSE), so that part is not new. SB 818 expands the curriculum already in place in Illinois to ensure Illinois schools align with national standards. (7) Note specifically in one of the above paragraphs, SB 818 “creates personal health and safety standards for grades K-5 and updates and expands comprehensive sexual health education standards in grades 6-12.”
CSE proponents claimed that CSE curricula are “age-appropriate” and “evidence-based.” Opponents argue the criteria for determining age-appropriateness and the source for the criteria are not identified, and no conclusive evidence has been provided proving that CSE curricula are more effective than abstinence-based curricula at solving the problems of STDs and unplanned pregnancies.
Opponents further argue that CSE is designed to change the sexual and gender norms of society. CSE promotes high-risk sexual behaviors and encourages even the youngest of children to experiment sexually. CSE is promoted globally through the United Nations and Planned Parenthood. Smaller countries have been threatened with federal aid cuts if they don’t comply.
Proponents define “culturally appropriate” as “affirming culturally diverse individuals, families, and communities in an inclusive, respectful, and effective manner, including materials and instruction that are inclusive of race, ethnicity, language, cultural background, immigration status, religion, disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and sexual behavior.” (8)
The legislation does make provision that “No student shall be required to take or participate in any class or course in comprehensive personal health and safety and comprehensive sexual health education. A student’s parent or guardian may opt the student out of comprehensive personal health and safety and comprehensive sexual health education by submitting the request in writing. Refusal to take or participate in such a course or program may not be a reason for disciplinary action, academic penalty, suspension, or expulsion or any other sanction of a student.” (9)
While that sounds like an opt out, what student will want to be singled out and embarrassed in front of their peers. And consider that their peers will most certainly share the information with which they are being indoctrinated. This article has not touched on the disregard, even rebellion, against biblical standards of parental rights and responsibilities regarding education and sexuality and the boundary violation of civil government incursion into the family sphere. The Illinois Family Institute has scheduled eight events around the state in which they will lay out a plan that includes several options for individuals, families and churches. That information will be reported on in follow-up articles along with pertinent history on how education arrived this lamentable place. (10)
Endnotes:
https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/
https://blog.prepscholar.com/average-sat-scores-over-time
IFI-PSE-Reasons-to-Exit-Illinois-Government-Schools-web.pdf
https://illinoisfamily.org/education/alliance-seeks-to-rescue-illinois-children-from-indoctrination/
https://www.aclu-il.org/en/legislation/sex-ed
IFI_PSE_Comp-Sex-Ed-booklet-web.pdf
https://wgem.com/2021/05/28/illinois-lawmakers-pass-sex-education-bill-for-k-12-students/
https://illinoisfamily.org/homosexuality/cultural-collision-comprehensive-sex-ed-passed-in-illinois-senate/
https://illinoisfamily.org/education/sex-education-opt-out-for-students/
https://illinoisfamily.org/education/christian-education-is-vital-we-have-a-plan/
By Joyce Geiler
Many Christians are familiar with Romans 8:28 “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.” Without taking this verse out of the context in which the Apostle Paul is encouraging believers to persevere knowing that God is working a higher purpose in their lives, consider applying this scripture to the Covid pandemic. Is God really able to work that for our good? There is most certainly one area in which He already is - the sphere of education of our children. As frustrating as schooling has been for parents and students during the shutdown of schools, the biggest take-away for many parents has been the exposure to the education their children are or are not getting in Illinois’ government-run public schools. Eyes have been opened and parents are searching for alternatives. This article will begin to explore weaknesses and contra-biblical aspects of Illinois’ public school system. This is not intended to be an attack on teachers, but a discussion of the system that has overtaken the parental role in education in a most detrimental way.
Although this article begins by presenting data regarding the inadequate job Illinois’ public schools are doing in the area of education, the second part of the article will address the larger issue, the more egregious issue, of what is happening regarding sex-education in our schools.
IllinoisReportCard.com is the state’s official source for information about public schools across Illinois. (1) Illinoisreportcard.com reports that only 32% of students met or exceeded grade level proficiency standards in math for the 2019 school year after completing the Scholarship Aptitude Test (SAT). Only 38% of students met or exceeded grade level proficiency in English Language Arts. The Illinois Science Assessment test shows 49% of students are at grade proficiency in science. Illinois Report Card states: “These skills are necessary in order for students to be successful in the real world.”
From 2006 to 2016 the overall average SAT scores fell a total of 34 points, falling in each of the three sections tested. There was a sharp increase in scores in 2017 partly due to the massive redesign of the testing, not an increased proficiency. (2) Overall, Illinois is neither the highest nor the lowest among the states in SAT scores.
Illinois Family Institute notes that rather than focus time and resources on helping students master the basics, “social justice warriors in Springfield, the Illinois State Board of Education, and in government schools are spending increasing amounts of time and resources indoctrinating students with leftist dogma on race, homosexuality, and ‘trans’-cultism.” (3) Our children are truly at risk.
The Illinois Family Institute explains that a small committee approved of the revision of teaching standards, which will require all teachers to become well versed in Critical Race Theory, LGBTQ ideology, and BLM Marxist brainwashing. (4) On May 20, the Illinois Senate passed SB 818, the highly controversial “comprehensive sex education” bill. On May 28, the House likewise passed the bill, which as of this writing awaits the signature of Governor Pritzker to become law. Since he has expressed a plan to "trans" all public schools, he is expected to sign the bill into law. The Illinois Legislature and Governor Pritzker have crossed the boundary lines of parental authority and are claiming authority to direct the education process with sweeping mandates.
SB 818 is named the “Keeping Youth Safe and Healthy Act.” According to the Illinois ACLU, the bill:
“Creates personal health and safety standards for grades K-5 and updates and expands comprehensive sexual health education standards in grades 6-12 to give young people the information and tools they need to be safe and support responsible and informed decision making about their health and well-being throughout their lives. These topics include but are not limited to: anatomy and physiology; healthy relationships; identity; personal safety; pregnancy and reproduction; puberty, growth and adolescent development; and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.”
“It also expands the current requirement that instruction be medically accurate, developmentally and age appropriate to include instruction that is also culturally appropriate, inclusive, and trauma informed. The bill also ensures that comprehensive personal health and safety and sexual health education in Illinois is affirming of identities including those who historically have been stigmatized or excluded including LGBTQIA and pregnant or parenting youth.” (5)
What is it about this legislation that is so offensive and distressing to parents and Bible believing people? In their booklet “Comprehensive Sexuality Education,” the Illinois Family Institute writes that if a school teaches any form of “personal health and safety,” it MUST teach Comprehensive Sex Education (CSE). (6) Note that in 2013, the Illinois General Assembly passed a law mandating that any public school that teaches sex ed must teach comprehensive sex ed (CSE), so that part is not new. SB 818 expands the curriculum already in place in Illinois to ensure Illinois schools align with national standards. (7) Note specifically in one of the above paragraphs, SB 818 “creates personal health and safety standards for grades K-5 and updates and expands comprehensive sexual health education standards in grades 6-12.”
CSE proponents claimed that CSE curricula are “age-appropriate” and “evidence-based.” Opponents argue the criteria for determining age-appropriateness and the source for the criteria are not identified, and no conclusive evidence has been provided proving that CSE curricula are more effective than abstinence-based curricula at solving the problems of STDs and unplanned pregnancies.
Opponents further argue that CSE is designed to change the sexual and gender norms of society. CSE promotes high-risk sexual behaviors and encourages even the youngest of children to experiment sexually. CSE is promoted globally through the United Nations and Planned Parenthood. Smaller countries have been threatened with federal aid cuts if they don’t comply.
Proponents define “culturally appropriate” as “affirming culturally diverse individuals, families, and communities in an inclusive, respectful, and effective manner, including materials and instruction that are inclusive of race, ethnicity, language, cultural background, immigration status, religion, disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and sexual behavior.” (8)
The legislation does make provision that “No student shall be required to take or participate in any class or course in comprehensive personal health and safety and comprehensive sexual health education. A student’s parent or guardian may opt the student out of comprehensive personal health and safety and comprehensive sexual health education by submitting the request in writing. Refusal to take or participate in such a course or program may not be a reason for disciplinary action, academic penalty, suspension, or expulsion or any other sanction of a student.” (9)
While that sounds like an opt out, what student will want to be singled out and embarrassed in front of their peers. And consider that their peers will most certainly share the information with which they are being indoctrinated. This article has not touched on the disregard, even rebellion, against biblical standards of parental rights and responsibilities regarding education and sexuality and the boundary violation of civil government incursion into the family sphere. The Illinois Family Institute has scheduled eight events around the state in which they will lay out a plan that includes several options for individuals, families and churches. That information will be reported on in follow-up articles along with pertinent history on how education arrived this lamentable place. (10)
Endnotes:
https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/
https://blog.prepscholar.com/average-sat-scores-over-time
IFI-PSE-Reasons-to-Exit-Illinois-Government-Schools-web.pdf
https://illinoisfamily.org/education/alliance-seeks-to-rescue-illinois-children-from-indoctrination/
https://www.aclu-il.org/en/legislation/sex-ed
IFI_PSE_Comp-Sex-Ed-booklet-web.pdf
https://wgem.com/2021/05/28/illinois-lawmakers-pass-sex-education-bill-for-k-12-students/
https://illinoisfamily.org/homosexuality/cultural-collision-comprehensive-sex-ed-passed-in-illinois-senate/
https://illinoisfamily.org/education/sex-education-opt-out-for-students/
https://illinoisfamily.org/education/christian-education-is-vital-we-have-a-plan/
Tap Root of Iniquity By Joyce Geiler
The Coalition of Apostolic Alliances (CAA) gathered March 8 in Collinsville for their bimonthly meeting. This group meets as an ekklesia to spiritually deal with issues concerning Illinois. This gathering focused on the taproot of iniquity in Illinois. Just what does that mean?
The story begins in 2010 when nationally known prophet, Chuck Pierce, visited Southern Illinois and identified seven Freedom Outpost cities in Illinois. Freedom Outposts should be regions where the righteousness of the Kingdom of God is seen in all spheres of culture. They were identified as East. St. Louis/Granite city, Champaign, Springfield, Peoria, Rockford, Marion and Chicago.
In 2017, when this prophet returned to Illinois, he noted that these same cities were ruled spiritually by Thrones of Iniquity that were strong enough that the Freedom Outposts were not rising up to their God-ordained potential to bring Kingdom liberty to their respective regions. According to Pierce, thrones of iniquity are places where Satan has gained legal access and established his legal right to control an area, blocking heavens’ will on earth. Satan gains access into an area the same way he gains access into an individual’s life or into a family line—through sin. Individual or family sin can be escalated and exploited by Satan into corporate sin or influence over an entire area or territory directly opposing God’s plan for that territory.
Revelation 2:13 refers to this when the Lord says “I know your works, and where you dwell, where Satan's throne is.” Remember, Satan wanted to exalt himself to become like God so that he would be worshiped. In exalting himself, Satan is attempting to draw all people to his counterfeit “light.” Thrones of iniquity occur with corporate acceptance and worship of sin. They are Satan’s counterfeit kingdom where Satan attempts to take God’s glory for himself.
Although the Ekklesia in Illinois has been aware of and prayed concerning the Freedom Outposts and Thrones of Iniquity since those prophecies were known, not enough progress has been made to topple Satan’s thrones. Illinois is still in distress. Those participating in the CAA felt directed of the Lord has brought His ekklesia into a kairos or opportune time, in which the Ekklesia is not only gaining revelation regarding the thrones but also strategies to defeat Satan’s throne and magnify God’s ever-increasing Kingdom in Illinois.
A few months ago, during a time of prayer for Illinois, an intercessor from Collinsville envisioned Illinois being lifted by God’s hand like a potted plant being lifted out of its pot. The dirt and roots were exposed. As God lifted up Illinois, the roots became visible and, in particular, a thick tap root that reached down into the ground (the other roots were like hairs in comparison). The intercessor knew that it was the major root to the evil in the state but had no idea what it was or what it was called. Then she saw the tap root being cut.
At the January meeting of the CAA in Sycamore, the Ekklesia prayed about the vision of the taproot but did not get further clarification. The CAA gathered again for their bimonthly meeting on March 8, this time in Collinsville. At this meeting, it became clear that the taproot was in the area at the Cahokia Mounds.
As stated earlier in this article, a throne of iniquity is built on a culture of sin. Cahokia was the largest and earliest civilization in North America with its influence permeating much of the central area of what is now the United States. It was a culture of territorial control, enslavement, human sacrifice, and corrupted commerce, in short, a culture of sin. There have been many prayer initiatives and events at Monk’s Mound, the center of worship for Cahokia. Little by little the layers of prayers have worked their work, exposing more and more revelation. The CAA felt that now, in this God-appointed time, the taproot has been exposed.
Through worship, prayer and decree, the ekklesia dealt spiritually with that taproot of iniquity. Before the Ekklesia made their decrees, Pastor Stan Pratt of Taylorville, explained the nature of the roots of the aspen tree.
Aspens have many unique characteristics that enable them to flourish, but one characteristic in particular relates to the roots. Aspens are aided by the rhizomatic nature of their root systems. Most aspens grow in large clonal colonies, derived from a single seedling, and spread by means of root suckers; new stems in the colony may appear at up to 100–130 ft from the parent tree. Each individual tree can live for 40–150 years above ground, but the root system of the colony is long-lived. In some cases, this is for thousands of years, sending up new trunks as the older trunks die off above ground. For this reason, it is considered to be an indicator of ancient woodlands. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspen
It became apparent that not only must the tap root be severed but also the spreading roots that feed other regions of Illinois.
Following are some of the spiritual decrees made by the Ekklesia gathered on March 8:
• We announce the root of the Kingdom and this land belong to Christ. The earth is the Lord’s. •
• We denounce false root structures, false worship.
• We denounce 1400 years or longer of false worship (since the time of the Cahokia settlement). • This day it is uprooted. From the womb area of Illinois, we call forth new life. We do not market or traffic.
• The root of the Kingdom stands planted.
• Roots of this territory go into the Kingdom.
• Job 14 says a dead stump will sprout at the scent of water. We say this taproot will receive no scent of water and will not receive water. We guard our hearts and lips and give no space for growth for these roots. We speak words of life, not compromise. Together we will see the victory. This is an apostolic state. The life of Christ taking root
Pastor Stan Pratt added this prayer and the local Collinsville ekklesia affirmed agreement.
“Lord, as we have spoken death to this tap-root, we now ask for persons to rise up and bring business to the Metro East area that will fill the void of the loss of certain tourist income, to bring something that will replace the loss of revenue from Planned Parenthood, to transform the area into a prospering area by replacing gambling places and casinos with fruitful tax-paying businesses, to make up the void of lost revenue among the citizens that comes from alcoholism, drugs, human trafficking, and more. Deliver those in “slave style camps" - illegal aliens supported by our tax dollars through Social Justice / unrighteous programs of the Catholic Church. Lord, we cannot leave the citizens of the Metro-East area with no means of financial support to replace the income that was derived from sin and unrighteousness. Bring entrepreneurs into the Metro-East area to finance and build up the community. Our intent Lord was (and we did) pull that old root producing unrighteous fruit of every kind, but not to leave the citizens high and dry with no proper means of supporting themselves or their area. We receive Christ as Your Wisdom and will act on what we discern by your Spirit. May we and others be laborers in that field which is becoming white unto harvest.”
Over the next few years, the CAA will plan to hold meetings in the other Freedom Outposts being hindered by Thrones of Iniquity and seek wisdom to effectively pray “on earth as it is in heaven.”
The Coalition of Apostolic Alliances (CAA) gathered March 8 in Collinsville for their bimonthly meeting. This group meets as an ekklesia to spiritually deal with issues concerning Illinois. This gathering focused on the taproot of iniquity in Illinois. Just what does that mean?
The story begins in 2010 when nationally known prophet, Chuck Pierce, visited Southern Illinois and identified seven Freedom Outpost cities in Illinois. Freedom Outposts should be regions where the righteousness of the Kingdom of God is seen in all spheres of culture. They were identified as East. St. Louis/Granite city, Champaign, Springfield, Peoria, Rockford, Marion and Chicago.
In 2017, when this prophet returned to Illinois, he noted that these same cities were ruled spiritually by Thrones of Iniquity that were strong enough that the Freedom Outposts were not rising up to their God-ordained potential to bring Kingdom liberty to their respective regions. According to Pierce, thrones of iniquity are places where Satan has gained legal access and established his legal right to control an area, blocking heavens’ will on earth. Satan gains access into an area the same way he gains access into an individual’s life or into a family line—through sin. Individual or family sin can be escalated and exploited by Satan into corporate sin or influence over an entire area or territory directly opposing God’s plan for that territory.
Revelation 2:13 refers to this when the Lord says “I know your works, and where you dwell, where Satan's throne is.” Remember, Satan wanted to exalt himself to become like God so that he would be worshiped. In exalting himself, Satan is attempting to draw all people to his counterfeit “light.” Thrones of iniquity occur with corporate acceptance and worship of sin. They are Satan’s counterfeit kingdom where Satan attempts to take God’s glory for himself.
Although the Ekklesia in Illinois has been aware of and prayed concerning the Freedom Outposts and Thrones of Iniquity since those prophecies were known, not enough progress has been made to topple Satan’s thrones. Illinois is still in distress. Those participating in the CAA felt directed of the Lord has brought His ekklesia into a kairos or opportune time, in which the Ekklesia is not only gaining revelation regarding the thrones but also strategies to defeat Satan’s throne and magnify God’s ever-increasing Kingdom in Illinois.
A few months ago, during a time of prayer for Illinois, an intercessor from Collinsville envisioned Illinois being lifted by God’s hand like a potted plant being lifted out of its pot. The dirt and roots were exposed. As God lifted up Illinois, the roots became visible and, in particular, a thick tap root that reached down into the ground (the other roots were like hairs in comparison). The intercessor knew that it was the major root to the evil in the state but had no idea what it was or what it was called. Then she saw the tap root being cut.
At the January meeting of the CAA in Sycamore, the Ekklesia prayed about the vision of the taproot but did not get further clarification. The CAA gathered again for their bimonthly meeting on March 8, this time in Collinsville. At this meeting, it became clear that the taproot was in the area at the Cahokia Mounds.
As stated earlier in this article, a throne of iniquity is built on a culture of sin. Cahokia was the largest and earliest civilization in North America with its influence permeating much of the central area of what is now the United States. It was a culture of territorial control, enslavement, human sacrifice, and corrupted commerce, in short, a culture of sin. There have been many prayer initiatives and events at Monk’s Mound, the center of worship for Cahokia. Little by little the layers of prayers have worked their work, exposing more and more revelation. The CAA felt that now, in this God-appointed time, the taproot has been exposed.
Through worship, prayer and decree, the ekklesia dealt spiritually with that taproot of iniquity. Before the Ekklesia made their decrees, Pastor Stan Pratt of Taylorville, explained the nature of the roots of the aspen tree.
Aspens have many unique characteristics that enable them to flourish, but one characteristic in particular relates to the roots. Aspens are aided by the rhizomatic nature of their root systems. Most aspens grow in large clonal colonies, derived from a single seedling, and spread by means of root suckers; new stems in the colony may appear at up to 100–130 ft from the parent tree. Each individual tree can live for 40–150 years above ground, but the root system of the colony is long-lived. In some cases, this is for thousands of years, sending up new trunks as the older trunks die off above ground. For this reason, it is considered to be an indicator of ancient woodlands. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspen
It became apparent that not only must the tap root be severed but also the spreading roots that feed other regions of Illinois.
Following are some of the spiritual decrees made by the Ekklesia gathered on March 8:
• We announce the root of the Kingdom and this land belong to Christ. The earth is the Lord’s. •
• We denounce false root structures, false worship.
• We denounce 1400 years or longer of false worship (since the time of the Cahokia settlement). • This day it is uprooted. From the womb area of Illinois, we call forth new life. We do not market or traffic.
• The root of the Kingdom stands planted.
• Roots of this territory go into the Kingdom.
• Job 14 says a dead stump will sprout at the scent of water. We say this taproot will receive no scent of water and will not receive water. We guard our hearts and lips and give no space for growth for these roots. We speak words of life, not compromise. Together we will see the victory. This is an apostolic state. The life of Christ taking root
Pastor Stan Pratt added this prayer and the local Collinsville ekklesia affirmed agreement.
“Lord, as we have spoken death to this tap-root, we now ask for persons to rise up and bring business to the Metro East area that will fill the void of the loss of certain tourist income, to bring something that will replace the loss of revenue from Planned Parenthood, to transform the area into a prospering area by replacing gambling places and casinos with fruitful tax-paying businesses, to make up the void of lost revenue among the citizens that comes from alcoholism, drugs, human trafficking, and more. Deliver those in “slave style camps" - illegal aliens supported by our tax dollars through Social Justice / unrighteous programs of the Catholic Church. Lord, we cannot leave the citizens of the Metro-East area with no means of financial support to replace the income that was derived from sin and unrighteousness. Bring entrepreneurs into the Metro-East area to finance and build up the community. Our intent Lord was (and we did) pull that old root producing unrighteous fruit of every kind, but not to leave the citizens high and dry with no proper means of supporting themselves or their area. We receive Christ as Your Wisdom and will act on what we discern by your Spirit. May we and others be laborers in that field which is becoming white unto harvest.”
Over the next few years, the CAA will plan to hold meetings in the other Freedom Outposts being hindered by Thrones of Iniquity and seek wisdom to effectively pray “on earth as it is in heaven.”
Illinois Police Reform that Undermines Law Enforcement
By Joyce Geiler
On February 22, 2021, Governor Pritzker signed into law HB 3553 Police Reform. News headlines run the gamut from accusations of anti-law enforcement to praise by reform advocates. Most news headlines focus on one or two parts of the new law. It may be a challenge to determine the details contained in the 764 pages of the new law, some of which do not go into effect until 2023. This article reports some of the more commonly headlined aspects of the law and then lists more specific details.
State Senator Kimberly Lightford pointed to the death of George Floyd last summer as a key reason the American culture "awakened" to inequalities in the state's justice system. However, retired Judge Pat O'Brien warns about dangers within the bill and calls the new law “a measure that will expose citizens to criminal behavior and defend the rights of the accused over the rights of victims.” Some of his specific concerns are inserted later in this article. The Illinois Review labels the law “the nations most anti-law enforcement policy.” (1)
The Fraternal Order of Police writes that the law “eliminates all protections from law enforcement officers. It eliminates officer’s ability to pursue their job without civil liability, it eliminates the ability of officers to pursue collective bargaining agreements, it invalidates the constitutionally protected due process of officers and it substantially increases the costs for employers of law enforcement officers.” (2) Executive Director for the Illinois Sheriff's Association Jim Kaitschuk believes the law will have a significant impact on law enforcement and will create a threat to the community. (3)
The website reason.com, a libertarian news site, has a very extensive coverage of the bill. It is worth reviewing the detail to see more of what is actually in the bill. (4) The lengthy bill touches many areas of policing some of which are listed below and contains explanatory comments from other sources will be included in parentheses:
The police reform bill:
1) Creates a process for the state's attorney general to take a law enforcement officer to civil court if that officer has violated a person's civil rights and to seek financial damages, with a cap of $50,000. An earlier version of the bill would have stripped police officers of qualified immunity when they had been found to violate a person's rights, thus allowing individuals to sue officers in civil court; but that was removed from the final version of the bill.
2) Mandates body cameras for all police officers in the state, with compliance deadlines staggered across the next four years. (Note that no funding is provided.)
3) Establishes that after January 2023, monetary bail will be abolished within the state. Instead, people arrested for crimes will be evaluated with a goal of releasing them with only enough pretrial conditions to ensure they make it to subsequent court appearances and don't commit crimes while on release. Full detention will be ordered only "when it is determined that the defendant poses a specific, real and present threat to a person and has a high likelihood of willful flight." The court may use a risk assessment tool to evaluate the defendant, but the score cannot be the only reason why a defendant is denied pretrial release—and the defendant must be provided the information, so that he or she may challenge it. There are many exceptions to the orders for pretrial release, including defendants accused of stalking and domestic violence, many firearm-related crimes, human trafficking crimes, or any forcible felony that comes with a mandatory minimum prison sentence. Even in these cases, however, a court must determine that the defendant is too dangerous to be released. (This is the same as the law in New Jersey which establishes a presumption of release and forces the court to document why somebody is too risky to be released. America has about half a million people stuck in pretrial detention, many of whom are not dangerous to the public but simply cannot afford the cost of bail. People who are unable to earn pretrial freedom typically end up accepting worse plea deals and get harsher sentences than somebody able to address the charges outside of jail.) (5)
4) Establishes a new class 3 felony of law enforcement misconduct, with a possible sentence of two to five years in jail. This will cover officers who misrepresent facts during an investigation, withhold knowledge of misrepresentation by other officers, or fail to comply with state laws or department policies on body-worn cameras.
5) Allows cities with populations greater than 100,000 to require that police live within city limits. Current law only permits this for cities with population greater than 1 million.
6) Allows other first responders besides police to direct people they encounter with substance abuse problems toward treatment programs, without requiring an arrest.
7) Allows funds for police and first responders to carry naloxone and similar supplies that can reverse opioid overdoses.
8) Prohibits law enforcement agencies from requesting or receiving excess military equipment, such as armored vehicles, large-caliber guns, or grenade launchers. (Retired Judge Pat O’Brien feels this prevents departments from taking advantage of cost saving federal surplus programs.)
9) Prohibits retaliation against whistleblowers, a problem that has come up repeatedly when people try to expose misconduct in the Chicago Police Department.
10) Demands that all records connected to complaints against police officers and investigations of police officers be retained permanently. (Retired Judge O’Brien Mandates speaks against those unsubstantiated and unverified complaints being kept, to be used against officers, forever, with no destruction and no limits on how they can be utilized to inflict harm on officers.)
11) Adds crisis intervention and de-escalation training to the curriculum for new police officers and to mandatory training every three years. (Retired Judge O’Brien notes this substantially increases both initial and ongoing education requirements with no money to pay for the increased costs and no assurances that the courses will even be offered.)
12) Requires the state police to participate in and provide data to the FBI's National Use of Force database.
13) Amends the police disciplinary process system so that officers under investigation are not provided the names of those filing the complaint, and so that it is no longer a requirement for people to provide their names in order to file a complaint about police misconduct. The Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board is authorized to perform the preliminary review to see if there is evidence that supports the anonymous complaint. (Retired Judge O’Brien says this allows officers to be punished or fired based on anonymous and unsubstantiated or unverifiable complaints and it allows for unrestricted and ungoverned disciplinary policies of law enforcement officers.)
14) Halts the practice of suspending driver's licenses for failure to pay traffic citations or abandoned vehicle fees.
15) Amends the definition of resisting or obstructing a police officer. People cannot be charged simply with resisting arrest; there must first be an underlying offense for which the person was already subject to arrest.
16) Forbids the use of deadly force against people who are a danger only to themselves, and it forbids the use of deadly force against those suspected of committing only property offenses (except in cases of terrorism). The new rules require that deadly force be used only "when reasonably necessary in defense of human life." It also explains that "merely a fear of future harm" is not enough to reach this threshold. That's an important distinction, because many defenses of police shootings of unarmed suspects revolve around the officers claiming that they feared the suspect was armed.
16) Forbids chokeholds and neck restraints and forbids the use of force as punishment or retaliation. It forbids the use of non-lethal weapons in a manner that targets the head, pelvis, or back, and it forbids firing non-lethal weapons indiscriminately into crowds. It also forbids using irritants like tear gas against crowds unless police have both ordered the crowd to disperse and given it enough time to do so.
17) Establishes a duty to render aid to anybody police encounter who is injured (or anybody they injure) and an affirmative duty to intervene when they witness another police officer using unauthorized force. Retaliation against an officer who intervenes in this fashion is forbidden.
18) Calls for the citation and release rather than the arrest of anybody accused of traffic offenses, petty offenses, or low-level misdemeanors, unless they pose an obvious threat to others or themselves.
19) Establishes that all police officers must be certified to perform as law enforcement by the state's Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board. It gives the board the authority to suspend an officer's certification immediately if the officer has been arrested or indicted on felony charges. A panel will hear the officer's case and can decide whether to maintain or reverse the officer's suspension of certification.
20) Orders the creation of a searchable database of law enforcement officers, available to the public, showing each officer's certification status and any sustained complaints of misconduct.
As the nation has seen, especially since last summer, emotions and opinions are strong regarding these issues creating opportunities for misinformation and disinformation and for fear and mistrust. It remains to be seen how Illinois’ new police reforms are implemented and what the results will be. Although reforms are most certainly needed, it is disconcerting to see restrictions that could hamper law enforcement in an era of lawlessness and lack of self-governance.
End Notes:
https://www.illinoisreview.com/illinoisreview/2021/02/pritzker-signs-into-law-nations-most-anti-law-enforcement-policy.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2FbYHz+%28Illinois+Review%29
http://www.chicagofop.org/news/urgent-and-important-police-reform-update-hb-163
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/police-reform-bill-introduced-to-illinois-general-assembly/ar-BB1cz6fK
https://reason.com/2021/01/14/massive-illinois-police-reform-bill-ends-cash-bail-limits-deadly-force-mandates-body-cameras-and-makes-it-easier-to-dump-crooked-cops/
https://reason.com/2021/01/14/massive-illinois-police-reform-bill-ends-cash-bail-limits-deadly-force-mandates-body-cameras-and-makes-it-easier-to-dump-crooked-cops/
By Joyce Geiler
On February 22, 2021, Governor Pritzker signed into law HB 3553 Police Reform. News headlines run the gamut from accusations of anti-law enforcement to praise by reform advocates. Most news headlines focus on one or two parts of the new law. It may be a challenge to determine the details contained in the 764 pages of the new law, some of which do not go into effect until 2023. This article reports some of the more commonly headlined aspects of the law and then lists more specific details.
State Senator Kimberly Lightford pointed to the death of George Floyd last summer as a key reason the American culture "awakened" to inequalities in the state's justice system. However, retired Judge Pat O'Brien warns about dangers within the bill and calls the new law “a measure that will expose citizens to criminal behavior and defend the rights of the accused over the rights of victims.” Some of his specific concerns are inserted later in this article. The Illinois Review labels the law “the nations most anti-law enforcement policy.” (1)
The Fraternal Order of Police writes that the law “eliminates all protections from law enforcement officers. It eliminates officer’s ability to pursue their job without civil liability, it eliminates the ability of officers to pursue collective bargaining agreements, it invalidates the constitutionally protected due process of officers and it substantially increases the costs for employers of law enforcement officers.” (2) Executive Director for the Illinois Sheriff's Association Jim Kaitschuk believes the law will have a significant impact on law enforcement and will create a threat to the community. (3)
The website reason.com, a libertarian news site, has a very extensive coverage of the bill. It is worth reviewing the detail to see more of what is actually in the bill. (4) The lengthy bill touches many areas of policing some of which are listed below and contains explanatory comments from other sources will be included in parentheses:
The police reform bill:
1) Creates a process for the state's attorney general to take a law enforcement officer to civil court if that officer has violated a person's civil rights and to seek financial damages, with a cap of $50,000. An earlier version of the bill would have stripped police officers of qualified immunity when they had been found to violate a person's rights, thus allowing individuals to sue officers in civil court; but that was removed from the final version of the bill.
2) Mandates body cameras for all police officers in the state, with compliance deadlines staggered across the next four years. (Note that no funding is provided.)
3) Establishes that after January 2023, monetary bail will be abolished within the state. Instead, people arrested for crimes will be evaluated with a goal of releasing them with only enough pretrial conditions to ensure they make it to subsequent court appearances and don't commit crimes while on release. Full detention will be ordered only "when it is determined that the defendant poses a specific, real and present threat to a person and has a high likelihood of willful flight." The court may use a risk assessment tool to evaluate the defendant, but the score cannot be the only reason why a defendant is denied pretrial release—and the defendant must be provided the information, so that he or she may challenge it. There are many exceptions to the orders for pretrial release, including defendants accused of stalking and domestic violence, many firearm-related crimes, human trafficking crimes, or any forcible felony that comes with a mandatory minimum prison sentence. Even in these cases, however, a court must determine that the defendant is too dangerous to be released. (This is the same as the law in New Jersey which establishes a presumption of release and forces the court to document why somebody is too risky to be released. America has about half a million people stuck in pretrial detention, many of whom are not dangerous to the public but simply cannot afford the cost of bail. People who are unable to earn pretrial freedom typically end up accepting worse plea deals and get harsher sentences than somebody able to address the charges outside of jail.) (5)
4) Establishes a new class 3 felony of law enforcement misconduct, with a possible sentence of two to five years in jail. This will cover officers who misrepresent facts during an investigation, withhold knowledge of misrepresentation by other officers, or fail to comply with state laws or department policies on body-worn cameras.
5) Allows cities with populations greater than 100,000 to require that police live within city limits. Current law only permits this for cities with population greater than 1 million.
6) Allows other first responders besides police to direct people they encounter with substance abuse problems toward treatment programs, without requiring an arrest.
7) Allows funds for police and first responders to carry naloxone and similar supplies that can reverse opioid overdoses.
8) Prohibits law enforcement agencies from requesting or receiving excess military equipment, such as armored vehicles, large-caliber guns, or grenade launchers. (Retired Judge Pat O’Brien feels this prevents departments from taking advantage of cost saving federal surplus programs.)
9) Prohibits retaliation against whistleblowers, a problem that has come up repeatedly when people try to expose misconduct in the Chicago Police Department.
10) Demands that all records connected to complaints against police officers and investigations of police officers be retained permanently. (Retired Judge O’Brien Mandates speaks against those unsubstantiated and unverified complaints being kept, to be used against officers, forever, with no destruction and no limits on how they can be utilized to inflict harm on officers.)
11) Adds crisis intervention and de-escalation training to the curriculum for new police officers and to mandatory training every three years. (Retired Judge O’Brien notes this substantially increases both initial and ongoing education requirements with no money to pay for the increased costs and no assurances that the courses will even be offered.)
12) Requires the state police to participate in and provide data to the FBI's National Use of Force database.
13) Amends the police disciplinary process system so that officers under investigation are not provided the names of those filing the complaint, and so that it is no longer a requirement for people to provide their names in order to file a complaint about police misconduct. The Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board is authorized to perform the preliminary review to see if there is evidence that supports the anonymous complaint. (Retired Judge O’Brien says this allows officers to be punished or fired based on anonymous and unsubstantiated or unverifiable complaints and it allows for unrestricted and ungoverned disciplinary policies of law enforcement officers.)
14) Halts the practice of suspending driver's licenses for failure to pay traffic citations or abandoned vehicle fees.
15) Amends the definition of resisting or obstructing a police officer. People cannot be charged simply with resisting arrest; there must first be an underlying offense for which the person was already subject to arrest.
16) Forbids the use of deadly force against people who are a danger only to themselves, and it forbids the use of deadly force against those suspected of committing only property offenses (except in cases of terrorism). The new rules require that deadly force be used only "when reasonably necessary in defense of human life." It also explains that "merely a fear of future harm" is not enough to reach this threshold. That's an important distinction, because many defenses of police shootings of unarmed suspects revolve around the officers claiming that they feared the suspect was armed.
16) Forbids chokeholds and neck restraints and forbids the use of force as punishment or retaliation. It forbids the use of non-lethal weapons in a manner that targets the head, pelvis, or back, and it forbids firing non-lethal weapons indiscriminately into crowds. It also forbids using irritants like tear gas against crowds unless police have both ordered the crowd to disperse and given it enough time to do so.
17) Establishes a duty to render aid to anybody police encounter who is injured (or anybody they injure) and an affirmative duty to intervene when they witness another police officer using unauthorized force. Retaliation against an officer who intervenes in this fashion is forbidden.
18) Calls for the citation and release rather than the arrest of anybody accused of traffic offenses, petty offenses, or low-level misdemeanors, unless they pose an obvious threat to others or themselves.
19) Establishes that all police officers must be certified to perform as law enforcement by the state's Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board. It gives the board the authority to suspend an officer's certification immediately if the officer has been arrested or indicted on felony charges. A panel will hear the officer's case and can decide whether to maintain or reverse the officer's suspension of certification.
20) Orders the creation of a searchable database of law enforcement officers, available to the public, showing each officer's certification status and any sustained complaints of misconduct.
As the nation has seen, especially since last summer, emotions and opinions are strong regarding these issues creating opportunities for misinformation and disinformation and for fear and mistrust. It remains to be seen how Illinois’ new police reforms are implemented and what the results will be. Although reforms are most certainly needed, it is disconcerting to see restrictions that could hamper law enforcement in an era of lawlessness and lack of self-governance.
End Notes:
https://www.illinoisreview.com/illinoisreview/2021/02/pritzker-signs-into-law-nations-most-anti-law-enforcement-policy.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2FbYHz+%28Illinois+Review%29
http://www.chicagofop.org/news/urgent-and-important-police-reform-update-hb-163
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/police-reform-bill-introduced-to-illinois-general-assembly/ar-BB1cz6fK
https://reason.com/2021/01/14/massive-illinois-police-reform-bill-ends-cash-bail-limits-deadly-force-mandates-body-cameras-and-makes-it-easier-to-dump-crooked-cops/
https://reason.com/2021/01/14/massive-illinois-police-reform-bill-ends-cash-bail-limits-deadly-force-mandates-body-cameras-and-makes-it-easier-to-dump-crooked-cops/
The Power of Illinois JCAR
By Joyce Geiler
JCAR will be making a big decision February 16 regarding education in Illinois. The committee has previously made big decisions regarding Covid restrictions in Illinois. JCAR, the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, is possibly the most powerful committee in Illinois government and until recently very few Illinois citizens actually knew anything about it. This article will explain what JACAR is and how its members are appointed and the impact that has.
A Joint Committee is a committee constituted of members of both houses of government that has jurisdiction over matters of common interest. Most joint committees are standing committees. Joint committees usually are established with limited jurisdictions and these committees do not have legislative powers. (1) The joint committee in Illinois known as JCAR is an obscure but powerful committee that has great input into Illinois government. The bipartisan 12-person committee, formed in 1977, consists of lawmakers appointed by the Governor from both the House and Senate. This Committee basically makes the rules for carrying out the Governor’s executive orders and makes the rules for carrying out decisions made by other government agencies. (2) (3)
Currently, there are a total of 77 committees in Illinois state government: three joint standing committees, 27 standing committees in the Illinois Senate and 47 standing committees in the Illinois House. (4) JCAR, also referred to as the Administrative Rules Committee, is one of the three joint committees. It was created in 1977 pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act during the governorship of Republican Governor James R Thompson (Republican) and the presidency of George HW Bush. Other states also have Administrative Rules Committees. Illinois government agencies must adopt their entire rules in accordance with the rule-making procedures under this Act. (5) The Administrative Procedure Act can be found at link (6).
JCAR is an “oversight committee of the Illinois State Legislature authorized to conduct systematic reviews of administrative rules promulgated by State agencies. JCAR conducts several integrated review programs, including a review program for proposed, emergency and peremptory rulemaking, a review of new Public Acts and a complaint review program.” (7)
Illinois agencies must adopt their entire rules in accordance with the rule-making procedures under Administrative Procedure Act; JCAR then oversees compliance. “The joint committee undertakes studies and investigations concerning rule-making. It will conduct a systematic and continuing study of the rules and rulemaking process of all state agencies and will review the statutory authority on which an administrative rule is based. It will also evaluate the rules of every agency at least once in every five years.” (8)
Stated more simply, when any state agency makes a policy, the rules for implementing that policy must be in accordance with and approved by JCAR. Also, every executive order of the governor has to be quickly implemented by agencies. The executive order establishes the basic policy, but then an agency has to implement that policy through rules. JCAR drafts the rules.
Recent JCAR Activity
An example of JCAR’s role relates to the flurry of executive orders signed by Governor Pritzker since the COVID-19 pandemic began. For example, JCAR helped the Department of Public Health write rules to implement the governor’s executive order requiring individuals to wear face coverings indoors at any “business, service, facility or organization.” The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) re-filed a new COVID-19 Emergency Rule 690.50 on Tuesday, January 5th, extending its statewide restrictions and rules for another 150 days. At its meeting on January 12, JCAR had the authority to accept or reject/suspend the emergency rule. We are living with those accepted rules. Twelve members comprising JCAR rather than 174 members of Illinois legislative body ruled on the continuation of Covid restrictions.
A February 16th decision is to be made by JCAR that involves the “Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards.” In December, the Illinois State Board of Education, or ISBE, passed a new rule that would require “culturally responsive teaching and leading standards” to be incorporated in all Illinois teacher preparation programs. Critics of the proposed “Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards” have said they require educators to embrace left-leaning ideology and prioritize political and social activism in classrooms at a time when Illinois students are underperforming on basic skills tests. You can read the 52-page standards at link (9) These standards are even more egregious than those of California and Minnesota!
Unless JCAR votes to suspend the rule at its meeting February 16, these standards will apply to all Illinois professional educator licenses endorsed in teaching, school support personnel and administrative fields. The agency, the Illinois State Board of Education, formulated the rules; JCAR decides whether to approve or suspend the rules. As of this writing, it is believed only three of the twelve JCAR members have indicated they oppose the ISBE approved standards.
How Are Committee Members Chosen?
A review of how members of JCAR and members of the ISBE are appointed will illustrate the importance of understanding how the committee (JCAR) and agency (ISBE) function. Members of JCAR are chosen by the Governor. Current JCAR members are all from Cook County and surrounding counties except for LaSalle County, which, although it is not adjacent to Cook county, is included in the Chicago statistical area. JCAR is the only one of the three joint committees whose members are appointed by the governor. Members of the other two joint committees are chosen by the leadership of the House and Senate.
The 47 committees of the Illinois House of Representatives are assigned by the Speaker of the House and Minority Leader. The Speaker appoints the Chair, Vice-chair and remaining majority members while the Minority Leader appoints the minority members. Committees are assigned at the start of each term. (10) (Virtually no other state grants the types of powers to its legislative heads that Illinois grants to its Speaker. But that is for another article.)
The 27 committees of the Illinois State Senate are assigned by the President of the Senate and the Minority Leader. The President appoints the Chair, Vice-chair and remaining majority members, while the Minority Leader appoints the minority members. Committees are assigned at the start of each term. (11)
Illinois voters elect legislators who are to represent and to speak for their constituents. They are placed on committees where they consider the business of their assigned committee for the entire state. Either way, they are to be the voice of the citizens.
On the other hand, the Illinois State Board of Education consists of nine members who are appointed by the Governor with the consent of the Senate. Board members serve four-year terms, with membership limited to two consecutive terms. The Board appoints the State Superintendent of Education, who may be recommended by the Governor. The official site of the Board delineates their goals. (12)
Sifting through all this information reveals that the “Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards” formulated and approved by the Illinois State Board of Education and awaiting the approval of the rules for these standards by JCAR, are both in the hands of Governor Pritzker appointed agencies and committees. The Illinois legislature and the citizens of Illinois had little to no say in the matter at all. Now that it’s down to the wire, parents and citizens are making a concerted effort to convince JCAR to oppose the rules. Surely there is a better way to decide the educational standards for the children of Illinois than the process that has led to this immanent decision.
End Notes:
https://definitions.uslegal.com/j/Joint-Committee-Constitution/#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20a%20joint%20committee%20is,which%20are%20created%20to%20deal%20with%20specific%20issues
https://www.ilga.gov/commission/jcar/
news.wttw.com/sites/default/files/article/file (pdf download)
https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_committees_in_Illinois_state_government
https://administrativelaw.uslegal.com/administrative-procedure-acts/illinois/
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=83
https://ballotpedia.org/Administrative_Rules_Committee,_Illinois_General_Assembly
https://administrativelaw.uslegal.com/administrative-procedure-acts/illinois/
https://thenewamerican.com/illinois-teachers-told-to-adopt-progressive-ideology-or-be-fired/
https://ballotpedia.org/Mental_Health_Committee,_Illinois_House_of_Representatives
https://ballotpedia.org/Agriculture_Committee,_Illinois_State_Senate
www.isbe.net/Documents/ISBE-Strategic -Plan.pdf
By Joyce Geiler
JCAR will be making a big decision February 16 regarding education in Illinois. The committee has previously made big decisions regarding Covid restrictions in Illinois. JCAR, the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, is possibly the most powerful committee in Illinois government and until recently very few Illinois citizens actually knew anything about it. This article will explain what JACAR is and how its members are appointed and the impact that has.
A Joint Committee is a committee constituted of members of both houses of government that has jurisdiction over matters of common interest. Most joint committees are standing committees. Joint committees usually are established with limited jurisdictions and these committees do not have legislative powers. (1) The joint committee in Illinois known as JCAR is an obscure but powerful committee that has great input into Illinois government. The bipartisan 12-person committee, formed in 1977, consists of lawmakers appointed by the Governor from both the House and Senate. This Committee basically makes the rules for carrying out the Governor’s executive orders and makes the rules for carrying out decisions made by other government agencies. (2) (3)
Currently, there are a total of 77 committees in Illinois state government: three joint standing committees, 27 standing committees in the Illinois Senate and 47 standing committees in the Illinois House. (4) JCAR, also referred to as the Administrative Rules Committee, is one of the three joint committees. It was created in 1977 pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act during the governorship of Republican Governor James R Thompson (Republican) and the presidency of George HW Bush. Other states also have Administrative Rules Committees. Illinois government agencies must adopt their entire rules in accordance with the rule-making procedures under this Act. (5) The Administrative Procedure Act can be found at link (6).
JCAR is an “oversight committee of the Illinois State Legislature authorized to conduct systematic reviews of administrative rules promulgated by State agencies. JCAR conducts several integrated review programs, including a review program for proposed, emergency and peremptory rulemaking, a review of new Public Acts and a complaint review program.” (7)
Illinois agencies must adopt their entire rules in accordance with the rule-making procedures under Administrative Procedure Act; JCAR then oversees compliance. “The joint committee undertakes studies and investigations concerning rule-making. It will conduct a systematic and continuing study of the rules and rulemaking process of all state agencies and will review the statutory authority on which an administrative rule is based. It will also evaluate the rules of every agency at least once in every five years.” (8)
Stated more simply, when any state agency makes a policy, the rules for implementing that policy must be in accordance with and approved by JCAR. Also, every executive order of the governor has to be quickly implemented by agencies. The executive order establishes the basic policy, but then an agency has to implement that policy through rules. JCAR drafts the rules.
Recent JCAR Activity
An example of JCAR’s role relates to the flurry of executive orders signed by Governor Pritzker since the COVID-19 pandemic began. For example, JCAR helped the Department of Public Health write rules to implement the governor’s executive order requiring individuals to wear face coverings indoors at any “business, service, facility or organization.” The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) re-filed a new COVID-19 Emergency Rule 690.50 on Tuesday, January 5th, extending its statewide restrictions and rules for another 150 days. At its meeting on January 12, JCAR had the authority to accept or reject/suspend the emergency rule. We are living with those accepted rules. Twelve members comprising JCAR rather than 174 members of Illinois legislative body ruled on the continuation of Covid restrictions.
A February 16th decision is to be made by JCAR that involves the “Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards.” In December, the Illinois State Board of Education, or ISBE, passed a new rule that would require “culturally responsive teaching and leading standards” to be incorporated in all Illinois teacher preparation programs. Critics of the proposed “Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards” have said they require educators to embrace left-leaning ideology and prioritize political and social activism in classrooms at a time when Illinois students are underperforming on basic skills tests. You can read the 52-page standards at link (9) These standards are even more egregious than those of California and Minnesota!
Unless JCAR votes to suspend the rule at its meeting February 16, these standards will apply to all Illinois professional educator licenses endorsed in teaching, school support personnel and administrative fields. The agency, the Illinois State Board of Education, formulated the rules; JCAR decides whether to approve or suspend the rules. As of this writing, it is believed only three of the twelve JCAR members have indicated they oppose the ISBE approved standards.
How Are Committee Members Chosen?
A review of how members of JCAR and members of the ISBE are appointed will illustrate the importance of understanding how the committee (JCAR) and agency (ISBE) function. Members of JCAR are chosen by the Governor. Current JCAR members are all from Cook County and surrounding counties except for LaSalle County, which, although it is not adjacent to Cook county, is included in the Chicago statistical area. JCAR is the only one of the three joint committees whose members are appointed by the governor. Members of the other two joint committees are chosen by the leadership of the House and Senate.
The 47 committees of the Illinois House of Representatives are assigned by the Speaker of the House and Minority Leader. The Speaker appoints the Chair, Vice-chair and remaining majority members while the Minority Leader appoints the minority members. Committees are assigned at the start of each term. (10) (Virtually no other state grants the types of powers to its legislative heads that Illinois grants to its Speaker. But that is for another article.)
The 27 committees of the Illinois State Senate are assigned by the President of the Senate and the Minority Leader. The President appoints the Chair, Vice-chair and remaining majority members, while the Minority Leader appoints the minority members. Committees are assigned at the start of each term. (11)
Illinois voters elect legislators who are to represent and to speak for their constituents. They are placed on committees where they consider the business of their assigned committee for the entire state. Either way, they are to be the voice of the citizens.
On the other hand, the Illinois State Board of Education consists of nine members who are appointed by the Governor with the consent of the Senate. Board members serve four-year terms, with membership limited to two consecutive terms. The Board appoints the State Superintendent of Education, who may be recommended by the Governor. The official site of the Board delineates their goals. (12)
Sifting through all this information reveals that the “Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards” formulated and approved by the Illinois State Board of Education and awaiting the approval of the rules for these standards by JCAR, are both in the hands of Governor Pritzker appointed agencies and committees. The Illinois legislature and the citizens of Illinois had little to no say in the matter at all. Now that it’s down to the wire, parents and citizens are making a concerted effort to convince JCAR to oppose the rules. Surely there is a better way to decide the educational standards for the children of Illinois than the process that has led to this immanent decision.
End Notes:
https://definitions.uslegal.com/j/Joint-Committee-Constitution/#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20a%20joint%20committee%20is,which%20are%20created%20to%20deal%20with%20specific%20issues
https://www.ilga.gov/commission/jcar/
news.wttw.com/sites/default/files/article/file (pdf download)
https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_committees_in_Illinois_state_government
https://administrativelaw.uslegal.com/administrative-procedure-acts/illinois/
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=83
https://ballotpedia.org/Administrative_Rules_Committee,_Illinois_General_Assembly
https://administrativelaw.uslegal.com/administrative-procedure-acts/illinois/
https://thenewamerican.com/illinois-teachers-told-to-adopt-progressive-ideology-or-be-fired/
https://ballotpedia.org/Mental_Health_Committee,_Illinois_House_of_Representatives
https://ballotpedia.org/Agriculture_Committee,_Illinois_State_Senate
www.isbe.net/Documents/ISBE-Strategic -Plan.pdf
District Map-Making in Illinois
by Joyce Geiler
The district map making in Illinois keeps changing to ensure current people stay in power. Every ten years, after the Federal census, Illinois district maps are redrawn to reflect the changing population. The process used by Illinois, however, has promoted the status quo and made it nearly impossible to change the political climate in Illinois even when the voters try.
Michael Madigan has been in the General Assembly for 44 years and has been Speaker of the House for all but two of those years since 1983. Some people propose term limits as a way to stop what almost seems like tyranny. A downstate Senator, Kyle McCarter, even limited his senatorial service to two terms in accordance with his promise. A Paul Simon Public Policy Institute survey showed respondents overwhelmingly favor term limits for members of the Illinois General Assembly. Nearly 80 percent favor some form of term limits for senators and representatives with 82 percent in favor of limiting the time lawmakers can serve in leadership positions.
However, a term limits effort backed by Bruce Rauner when he was campaigning for governor, contains a lot more than just limiting senators and representatives to eight years in office. It also would reduce the Illinois Senate from 59 to 43 members and increase House membership from 118 to 123. Also, the proposed amendment sought to raise the threshold for overriding a governor’s veto from the current three-fifths vote to two-thirds. Perhaps giving voters legislative districts that are not manipulated to the maximum benefit of the party that draws the map is a much more effective way to encourage better government.
Most people have no idea how the legislative district in which they live was created; who drew the boundaries for the Illinois House and Senate districts in which they reside? Legislative districts for the 177 members of the Illinois General Assembly are redrawn every 10 years after the U.S. census. Democrats controlled the map-drawing process in 1981, 2001, and 2011. Republicans drew the map in 1991. The only 2 years since 1983 that Rep. Michael Madigan was not Speaker of the House were January 1995 to January 1997, during the decade of the Republican-drawn map.
The creative redrawing of district maps has been called "gerrymandering". It's not a new concept. The term came into use in 1812, named after E. Gerry (Governor of Massachusetts whose party redistricted the state in 1812) + (sala)mander, from the fancied resemblance of Essex County, Massachusetts to this animal, after the redistricting.
Personality, individual ambition, and policy issues have often affected reapportionment (redistricting) debates. The final redistricting outcome in Illinois has usually been the result of three conflicting historic themes: territory vs. population, geography vs. party, and incumbent vs. challenger.
Territory vs. Population
The dramatic surge in Chicago and Cook County's population, which tripled its growth from 1870 to 1910, resulted in downstaters blocking any redistricting from 1901 to 1955 in spite of the fact that the 1870 constitution provided for it. Downstate legislators had successfully been in control even with their rural population. During that time an attempt to use population to determine House districts and territory to determine Senate districts was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. These days Chicago faces a similar conundrum as its population moves to the suburbs. In 1955, all sides worked toward successful reapportionment, successful in that it brought about no profound political changes in the state.
Geography vs. Party
From 1870 to 1980, cumulative voting was used to elect members of the state House of Representatives. In 1980, political activist, later Governor, Pat Quinn, advocated a campaign to reduce the number of representatives in the state house through the "Cutback Amendment" which reduced the size of the house by one-third and proposed the single member district system - previously districts could have more than one Representative. One result of the cutback in House members from 177 to 118 members was that it allowed political party leaders to consolidate power and influence who may run for the state assembly. The complicated, detailed history of the redistricting issue in Illinois can be found in the pdf Legislative Redistricting in Illinois: A Historical Analysis.
http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lru/Green.pdf
Incumbent vs. Challenger
Self-preservation is a strong human characteristic, especially among Illinois legislators. Creative cartography has no doubt preserved many an incumbent. The incumbent can chop up the opposing party’s geographic strongholds and stick them onto districts where voter affiliation favors his party. Even better, one can use his map-drawing power to exact vengeance on a troublesome lawmaker, whose home can be conveniently placed outside the district he or she represents.
How is Map-making Currently Determined?
Section 3 of the Illinois Constitutional Amendment adopted at general election Nov. 4, 1980, provides that Legislative Districts shall be compact, contiguous, and substantially equal in population. In the year following the Federal census, the General Assembly by law shall redistrict the Legislative Districts and the Representative Districts. If no redistricting plan becomes effective by June 30 of that year, a Legislative Redistricting Commission shall be constituted consisting of eight members, no more than four of whom can be of the same political party. Specifics are given for how the members are chosen. (No longer is the governor the one to choose members.) If the Commission fails to file a redistricting plan by August 10, the Supreme Court shall submit two names, not of the same party and by September 5, the Secretary of State shall publicly conduct a random draw from those two names for the name of the ninth person on the Commission, who effectively becomes the tie-breaker so that a redistricting plan can be submitted.
Of the five legislative maps drawn since the 1970 constitution went into effect, only two have not ended in a random name being drawn from a hat. The draw has been used in every opportunity except 1971- the first year the new state constitution was in effect - and in 2011, the only post-census year since 1970 that Democrats controlled the governorship, the Illinois House, and the Illinois Senate. In 1981, Republicans controlled the governor's office, the Illinois House, and were just one vote shy of controlling the Illinois Senate, they lost the map-drawing privilege by the luck of the draw. In 1991, the draw went to the Republicans.
The 1971 map was a true compromise between a Republican governor, a Republican House and a Democratic Senate. The 2011 map was drawn and approved by Democrats, who controlled both chambers and the governor’s office. In the three remaps in between, the parties went all-or-nothing, choosing luck of the draw over compromise. Lost in the process is the interest of the voters who live in the districts that result from this game.
"Yes for Independent Maps" has a proposal: an Illinois constitutional amendment that will change the way redistricting is done. The movement says it will make the process transparent, independent and nonpartisan. It will be a citizen-led commission, with no politicians, no bureaucrats and no people that get state contracts.
A few years ago, when California voted on a similar independent redistricting amendment, some voiced concerns that the commission would not reflect the diversity of the state. Those worries turned out to be unfounded. Eleven of the fourteen members of the California commission belonged to minority groups (four Asian Americans, three Latinos, two African Americans, one Pacific Islander, one American Indian). Yes for Independent Maps has included diversity provisions. To find out more about the Independent Map Amendment or to download a petition, go to
http://www.mapamendment.org/index.html Notarized petitions must be mailed by April 21, 2016.
Unless otherwise noted all material in this article can be located at rebootillinois.com
by Joyce Geiler
The district map making in Illinois keeps changing to ensure current people stay in power. Every ten years, after the Federal census, Illinois district maps are redrawn to reflect the changing population. The process used by Illinois, however, has promoted the status quo and made it nearly impossible to change the political climate in Illinois even when the voters try.
Michael Madigan has been in the General Assembly for 44 years and has been Speaker of the House for all but two of those years since 1983. Some people propose term limits as a way to stop what almost seems like tyranny. A downstate Senator, Kyle McCarter, even limited his senatorial service to two terms in accordance with his promise. A Paul Simon Public Policy Institute survey showed respondents overwhelmingly favor term limits for members of the Illinois General Assembly. Nearly 80 percent favor some form of term limits for senators and representatives with 82 percent in favor of limiting the time lawmakers can serve in leadership positions.
However, a term limits effort backed by Bruce Rauner when he was campaigning for governor, contains a lot more than just limiting senators and representatives to eight years in office. It also would reduce the Illinois Senate from 59 to 43 members and increase House membership from 118 to 123. Also, the proposed amendment sought to raise the threshold for overriding a governor’s veto from the current three-fifths vote to two-thirds. Perhaps giving voters legislative districts that are not manipulated to the maximum benefit of the party that draws the map is a much more effective way to encourage better government.
Most people have no idea how the legislative district in which they live was created; who drew the boundaries for the Illinois House and Senate districts in which they reside? Legislative districts for the 177 members of the Illinois General Assembly are redrawn every 10 years after the U.S. census. Democrats controlled the map-drawing process in 1981, 2001, and 2011. Republicans drew the map in 1991. The only 2 years since 1983 that Rep. Michael Madigan was not Speaker of the House were January 1995 to January 1997, during the decade of the Republican-drawn map.
The creative redrawing of district maps has been called "gerrymandering". It's not a new concept. The term came into use in 1812, named after E. Gerry (Governor of Massachusetts whose party redistricted the state in 1812) + (sala)mander, from the fancied resemblance of Essex County, Massachusetts to this animal, after the redistricting.
Personality, individual ambition, and policy issues have often affected reapportionment (redistricting) debates. The final redistricting outcome in Illinois has usually been the result of three conflicting historic themes: territory vs. population, geography vs. party, and incumbent vs. challenger.
Territory vs. Population
The dramatic surge in Chicago and Cook County's population, which tripled its growth from 1870 to 1910, resulted in downstaters blocking any redistricting from 1901 to 1955 in spite of the fact that the 1870 constitution provided for it. Downstate legislators had successfully been in control even with their rural population. During that time an attempt to use population to determine House districts and territory to determine Senate districts was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. These days Chicago faces a similar conundrum as its population moves to the suburbs. In 1955, all sides worked toward successful reapportionment, successful in that it brought about no profound political changes in the state.
Geography vs. Party
From 1870 to 1980, cumulative voting was used to elect members of the state House of Representatives. In 1980, political activist, later Governor, Pat Quinn, advocated a campaign to reduce the number of representatives in the state house through the "Cutback Amendment" which reduced the size of the house by one-third and proposed the single member district system - previously districts could have more than one Representative. One result of the cutback in House members from 177 to 118 members was that it allowed political party leaders to consolidate power and influence who may run for the state assembly. The complicated, detailed history of the redistricting issue in Illinois can be found in the pdf Legislative Redistricting in Illinois: A Historical Analysis.
http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lru/Green.pdf
Incumbent vs. Challenger
Self-preservation is a strong human characteristic, especially among Illinois legislators. Creative cartography has no doubt preserved many an incumbent. The incumbent can chop up the opposing party’s geographic strongholds and stick them onto districts where voter affiliation favors his party. Even better, one can use his map-drawing power to exact vengeance on a troublesome lawmaker, whose home can be conveniently placed outside the district he or she represents.
How is Map-making Currently Determined?
Section 3 of the Illinois Constitutional Amendment adopted at general election Nov. 4, 1980, provides that Legislative Districts shall be compact, contiguous, and substantially equal in population. In the year following the Federal census, the General Assembly by law shall redistrict the Legislative Districts and the Representative Districts. If no redistricting plan becomes effective by June 30 of that year, a Legislative Redistricting Commission shall be constituted consisting of eight members, no more than four of whom can be of the same political party. Specifics are given for how the members are chosen. (No longer is the governor the one to choose members.) If the Commission fails to file a redistricting plan by August 10, the Supreme Court shall submit two names, not of the same party and by September 5, the Secretary of State shall publicly conduct a random draw from those two names for the name of the ninth person on the Commission, who effectively becomes the tie-breaker so that a redistricting plan can be submitted.
Of the five legislative maps drawn since the 1970 constitution went into effect, only two have not ended in a random name being drawn from a hat. The draw has been used in every opportunity except 1971- the first year the new state constitution was in effect - and in 2011, the only post-census year since 1970 that Democrats controlled the governorship, the Illinois House, and the Illinois Senate. In 1981, Republicans controlled the governor's office, the Illinois House, and were just one vote shy of controlling the Illinois Senate, they lost the map-drawing privilege by the luck of the draw. In 1991, the draw went to the Republicans.
The 1971 map was a true compromise between a Republican governor, a Republican House and a Democratic Senate. The 2011 map was drawn and approved by Democrats, who controlled both chambers and the governor’s office. In the three remaps in between, the parties went all-or-nothing, choosing luck of the draw over compromise. Lost in the process is the interest of the voters who live in the districts that result from this game.
"Yes for Independent Maps" has a proposal: an Illinois constitutional amendment that will change the way redistricting is done. The movement says it will make the process transparent, independent and nonpartisan. It will be a citizen-led commission, with no politicians, no bureaucrats and no people that get state contracts.
A few years ago, when California voted on a similar independent redistricting amendment, some voiced concerns that the commission would not reflect the diversity of the state. Those worries turned out to be unfounded. Eleven of the fourteen members of the California commission belonged to minority groups (four Asian Americans, three Latinos, two African Americans, one Pacific Islander, one American Indian). Yes for Independent Maps has included diversity provisions. To find out more about the Independent Map Amendment or to download a petition, go to
http://www.mapamendment.org/index.html Notarized petitions must be mailed by April 21, 2016.
Unless otherwise noted all material in this article can be located at rebootillinois.com
